International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review
- PMID: 33763851
- PMCID: PMC8406796
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2
International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review
Abstract
Background: In late 2019, the first cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were reported in Wuhan, China, followed by a worldwide spread. Numerous countries have implemented control measures related to international travel, including border closures, travel restrictions, screening at borders, and quarantine of travellers.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of international travel-related control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic on infectious disease transmission and screening-related outcomes.
Search methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19-specific databases, including the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register and the WHO Global Database on COVID-19 Research to 13 November 2020.
Selection criteria: We considered experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and modelling studies assessing the effects of travel-related control measures affecting human travel across international borders during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the original review, we also considered evidence on severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). In this version we decided to focus on COVID-19 evidence only. Primary outcome categories were (i) cases avoided, (ii) cases detected, and (iii) a shift in epidemic development. Secondary outcomes were other infectious disease transmission outcomes, healthcare utilisation, resource requirements and adverse effects if identified in studies assessing at least one primary outcome.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and subsequently full texts. For studies included in the analysis, one review author extracted data and appraised the study. At least one additional review author checked for correctness of data. To assess the risk of bias and quality of included studies, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool for observational studies concerned with screening, and a bespoke tool for modelling studies. We synthesised findings narratively. One review author assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE, and several review authors discussed these GRADE judgements.
Main results: Overall, we included 62 unique studies in the analysis; 49 were modelling studies and 13 were observational studies. Studies covered a variety of settings and levels of community transmission. Most studies compared travel-related control measures against a counterfactual scenario in which the measure was not implemented. However, some modelling studies described additional comparator scenarios, such as different levels of stringency of the measures (including relaxation of restrictions), or a combination of measures. Concerns with the quality of modelling studies related to potentially inappropriate assumptions about the structure and input parameters, and an inadequate assessment of model uncertainty. Concerns with risk of bias in observational studies related to the selection of travellers and the reference test, and unclear reporting of certain methodological aspects. Below we outline the results for each intervention category by illustrating the findings from selected outcomes. Travel restrictions reducing or stopping cross-border travel (31 modelling studies) The studies assessed cases avoided and shift in epidemic development. We found very low-certainty evidence for a reduction in COVID-19 cases in the community (13 studies) and cases exported or imported (9 studies). Most studies reported positive effects, with effect sizes varying widely; only a few studies showed no effect. There was very low-certainty evidence that cross-border travel controls can slow the spread of COVID-19. Most studies predicted positive effects, however, results from individual studies varied from a delay of less than one day to a delay of 85 days; very few studies predicted no effect of the measure. Screening at borders (13 modelling studies; 13 observational studies) Screening measures covered symptom/exposure-based screening or test-based screening (commonly specifying polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing), or both, before departure or upon or within a few days of arrival. Studies assessed cases avoided, shift in epidemic development and cases detected. Studies generally predicted or observed some benefit from screening at borders, however these varied widely. For symptom/exposure-based screening, one modelling study reported that global implementation of screening measures would reduce the number of cases exported per day from another country by 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72% to 95%) (moderate-certainty evidence). Four modelling studies predicted delays in epidemic development, although there was wide variation in the results between the studies (very low-certainty evidence). Four modelling studies predicted that the proportion of cases detected would range from 1% to 53% (very low-certainty evidence). Nine observational studies observed the detected proportion to range from 0% to 100% (very low-certainty evidence), although all but one study observed this proportion to be less than 54%. For test-based screening, one modelling study provided very low-certainty evidence for the number of cases avoided. It reported that testing travellers reduced imported or exported cases as well as secondary cases. Five observational studies observed that the proportion of cases detected varied from 58% to 90% (very low-certainty evidence). Quarantine (12 modelling studies) The studies assessed cases avoided, shift in epidemic development and cases detected. All studies suggested some benefit of quarantine, however the magnitude of the effect ranged from small to large across the different outcomes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Three modelling studies predicted that the reduction in the number of cases in the community ranged from 450 to over 64,000 fewer cases (very low-certainty evidence). The variation in effect was possibly related to the duration of quarantine and compliance. Quarantine and screening at borders (7 modelling studies; 4 observational studies) The studies assessed shift in epidemic development and cases detected. Most studies predicted positive effects for the combined measures with varying magnitudes (very low- to low-certainty evidence). Four observational studies observed that the proportion of cases detected for quarantine and screening at borders ranged from 68% to 92% (low-certainty evidence). The variation may depend on how the measures were combined, including the length of the quarantine period and days when the test was conducted in quarantine.
Authors' conclusions: With much of the evidence derived from modelling studies, notably for travel restrictions reducing or stopping cross-border travel and quarantine of travellers, there is a lack of 'real-world' evidence. The certainty of the evidence for most travel-related control measures and outcomes is very low and the true effects are likely to be substantially different from those reported here. Broadly, travel restrictions may limit the spread of disease across national borders. Symptom/exposure-based screening measures at borders on their own are likely not effective; PCR testing at borders as a screening measure likely detects more cases than symptom/exposure-based screening at borders, although if performed only upon arrival this will likely also miss a meaningful proportion of cases. Quarantine, based on a sufficiently long quarantine period and high compliance is likely to largely avoid further transmission from travellers. Combining quarantine with PCR testing at borders will likely improve effectiveness. Many studies suggest that effects depend on factors, such as levels of community transmission, travel volumes and duration, other public health measures in place, and the exact specification and timing of the measure. Future research should be better reported, employ a range of designs beyond modelling and assess potential benefits and harms of the travel-related control measures from a societal perspective.
Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
J
Figures


Update of
-
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2. PMID: 33502002 Updated.
References
References to studies included in this review
Adekunle 2020 {published data only}
Al‐Qahtani 2020 {published data only}
Al‐Tawfiq 2020 {published data only}
Anderson 2020 {published data only}
Anzai 2020 {published data only}
Arima 2020 {published data only}
Ashcroft 2020 {published data only}
Banholzer 2020 {published data only}
-
- Banholzer N, Van Weenen E, Kratzwald B, Seeliger A, Tschernutter D, Bottrighi P, et al. Estimating the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on documented infections with COVID-19: a cross-country analysis. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20062141] - DOI
Bays 2020 {published data only}
-
- Bays D, Bennett E, Finnie T. Investigating the potential benefit that requiring travellers to self-isolate on arrival may have upon the reducing of case importations during international outbreaks of influenza, SARS, Ebola virus disease and COVID-19. medRxiv 2020.
-
- Bays D, Bennett E, Finnie T. Using simulation to assess the potential effectiveness of implementing screening at national borders during international outbreaks of influenza, SARS, Ebola virus disease and COVID-19. medRxiv 2020.
Binny 2020 {published data only}
Boldog 2020 {published data only}
Chen J 2020 {published data only}
Chen T 2020 {published data only}
-
- Chen T, Huang S, Li G, Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhu J, et al. Quantitative effects of entry restrictions and travel quarantine on the next wave of COVID-19: Case studies of China and Singapore. SSRN 2020.
Chen Y‐H 2020 {published data only}
Chinazzi 2020 {published data only}
Clifford 2020a {published data only}
Clifford 2020b {published data only}
Costantino 2020 {published data only}
Davis 2020 {published data only}
-
- Davis JT, Chinazzi M, Perra N, Mu K, Piontti PY, Ajelli M, et al. Estimating the establishment of local transmission and the cryptic phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. medRxiv 2020.
Deeb 2020 {published data only}
-
- Deeb OE, Jalloul M. The dynamics of COVID-19 spread: evidence from Lebanon. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 2020;17(5):5618-32. - PubMed
Dickens 2020 {published data only}
Gostic 2020 {published data only}
Grannell 2020 {published data only}
-
- Grannell JJ, Grannell JR. A two-region SEIR COVID-19 epidemic model for the island of Ireland. medRxiv 2020.
Hoehl 2020 {published data only}
James 2020 {published data only}
Kang 2020 {published data only}
Kim 2020 {published data only}
Kivuti‐Bito 2020 {published data only}
-
- Kivuti-Bitok LW, Momodu AS, Cheptum JJ, Kimemia F, Gichuki I, Ngune I. System dynamics model of possible Covid-19 trajectories under various non-pharmaceutical intervention options in low-resource setting. medRxiv 2020.
Kwok 2020 {published data only}
-
- Kwok WC, Wong CK, Ma TF, Ho KW, Fan WTL, Chan KPF, et al. Border Restriction as a Public Health Measureto Limit Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). medRxiv 2020.
Lagier 2020 {published data only}
Liebig 2020 {published data only}
Linka 2020a {published data only}
Linka 2020b {published data only}
Lio 2020 {published data only}
Lytras 2020 {published data only}
Mandal 2020 {published data only}
-
- Mandal S, Bhatnagar T, Arinaminpathy N, Agarwal A, Chowdhury A, Murhekar M, et al. Prudent public health intervention strategies to control the coronavirus disease 2019 transmission in India: a mathematical model-based approach. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2020;151(2 & 3):190-9. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
McLure 2020 {published data only}
Nakamura 2020 {published data only}
Ng 2020 {published data only}
Nowrasteh 2020 {published data only}
-
- Nowrasteh A, Forrester AC, Cato Institute. How US travel restrictions on China affected the spread of COVID-19 in the United States. www.cato.org 2020.
Nuckchady 2020 {published data only}
-
- Nuckchady D. Impact of public health interventions on the COVID-19 epidemic: a stochastic model based on data from an African island. medRxiv 2020.
Odendaal 2020 {published data only}
-
- Odendaal WG. A method to model outbreaks of new infectious diseases with pandemic potential such as COVID-19. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.11.20034512] - DOI
Pinotti 2020 {published data only}
Quilty 2020 {published data only}
Russell TW 2020 {published data only}
Russell WA 2020 {published data only}
-
- Russell WA, Buckeridge DL. Effectiveness of quarantine and testing to prevent COVID-19 transmission from arriving travelers. medRxiv 2020.
Ryu 2020 {published data only}
Shaikh Abdul Karim 2020 {published data only}
Shi 2020 {published data only}
Sruthi 2020 {published data only}
-
- Sruthi CK, Biswal MR, Saraswat B, Joshi H, Prakash MK. How policies on restaurants, bars, nightclubs, masks, schools, and travel influenced Swiss COVID-19 reproduction ratios. medRxiv 2020.
Steyn 2020 {published data only}
Taylor 2020 {published data only}
-
- Taylor R, McCarthy CA, Patel V, Moir R, Kelly L, Snary E. The risk of introducing SARS-CoV-2 to the UK via international travel in August 2020. medRxiv 2020.
Utsunomiya 2020 {published data only}
Wells 2020 {published data only}
-
- Wells CR, Sah P, Moghadas SM, Pandey A, Shoukat A, Wang Y, et al. Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2020;117(13):7504-9. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Wilson 2020 {published data only}
Wong J 2020 {published data only}
Wong MC 2020 {published data only}
Yamahata 2020 {published data only}
Yang 2020 {published data only}
Zhang C 2020 {published data only}
-
- Zhang C, Qian LX, Hu JQ. COVID-19 pandemic with human mobility across countries. Journal of the Operations Research Society of China 2020 Aug 3 [Epub ahead of print].
Zhang L 2020 {published data only}
Zhong 2020 {published data only}
-
- Zhong L, Diagne M, Wang W, Gao J. Country distancing reveals the effectiveness of travel restrictions during COVID-19. medRxiv 2020.
References to studies excluded from this review
Adiga 2020 {published data only}
-
- Adiga A, Wang L, Sadilek A, Tendulkar A, Venkatramanan S, Vullikanti A, et al. Interplay of global multi-scale human mobility, social distancing, government interventions, and COVID-19 dynamics. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: ]
Aleta 2020 {published data only}
Annan 2015 {published data only}
Aravindakshan 2020 {published data only}
-
- Aravindakshan A, Boehnke J, Gholami E, Nayak A. Restarting after COVID-19: A data-driven evaluation of opening scenarios. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.28.20115980] - DOI
Arino 2020 {published data only}
Barkan 2020 {published data only}
-
- Barkan E, Shilo S, Talmor-Barkan Y. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 exit strategies building blocks. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.23.20072850] - DOI
Batista 2020 {published data only}
Bell 2004 {published data only}
Benkouiten 2013 {published data only}
Benkouiten 2014 {published data only}
Benkouiten 2015 {published data only}
Borracci 2020 {published data only}
-
- Borracci RA, Giglio ND. Forecasting the effect of social distancing on COVID-19 autumn-winter outbreak in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires. Estimacion del efecto del distanciamiento social sobre la epidemia de COVID-19 de otono-invierno en el area metropolitana de Buenos Aires. 2020;80 Suppl 3:7-15. - PubMed
Branas 2020 {published data only}
-
- Branas CC, Rundle A, Pei S, Yang W, Carr BG, Sims S, et al. Flattening the curve before it flattens us: hospital critical care capacity limits and mortality from novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) cases in US counties. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.01.20049759] - DOI
Brauer 2008 {published data only}
-
- Brauer F, Van den Driessche P, Wang L. Oscillations in a patchy environment disease model. Mathematical Biosciences 2008;215(1):1-10. - PubMed
Camitz 2006 {published data only}
Channapathi 2020 {published data only}
-
- Channapathi T, Thatikonda S. Stochastic transmission dynamic model for evaluating effectiveness of control measures of COVID-19. SSRN 2020. [DOI: ]
Cowling 2020 {published data only}
Dandekar 2020 {published data only}
Daon 2020 {published data only}
Dell'Omodarme 2005 {published data only}
Dursun 2020 {published data only}
Eksin 2020 {published data only}
Erandi 2020 {published data only}
-
- Erandi KK, Mahasinghe AC, Perera SS, Jayasinghe S. Effectiveness of the strategies implemented in Sri Lanka for controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2020;2020:2954519.
Espinoza 2020 {published data only}
Fang 2020 {published data only}
Fouquet 2020 {published data only}
-
- Fouquet R, O'Garra T. The behavioural, welfare and environmental effects of air travel reductions during and beyond COVID-19. SSRN 2020. [DOI: ]
Fredj 2020 {published data only}
Gardner 2016 {published data only}
Gatto 2020 {published data only}
-
- Gatto M, Bertuzzo E, Mari L, Miccoli S, Carraro L, Casagrandi R, et al. Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: effects of emergency containment measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2020. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004978117] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Gautret 2013a {published data only}
Gautret 2013b {published data only}
-
- Gautret P, Charrel R, Belhouchat K, Drali T, Benkouiten S, Nougairede A, et al. Lack of nasal carriage of novel corona virus (HCoV-EMC) in French Hajj pilgrims returning from the Hajj 2012, despite a high rate of respiratory symptoms. Clinical Microbiology & Infection 2013;19(7):E315-7. - PMC - PubMed
Gautret 2014 {published data only}
German 2015 {published data only}
Gill 2020 {published data only}
Godin 2021 {published data only}
-
- Godin A, Xia Y, Buckeridge DL, Mishra S, Douwes-Schultz D, Shen Y, et al. The role of case importation in explaining differences in early SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in Canada - a mathematical modeling study of surveillance data. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2021;102:254-9. - PMC - PubMed
Griffiths 2016 {published data only}
Gunthe 2020 {published data only}
Hossain 2020 {published data only}
Hossein 2020 {published data only}
-
- Hossein RT, Shahriari S, Azad AK, Vafaee F. Real-time time-series modelling for prediction of COVID-19 spread and intervention assessment. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.24.20078923] - DOI
Huang 2020 {published data only}
Hufnagel 2004 {published data only}
Jia 2020 {published data only}
-
- Jia JS, Lu X, Yuan Y, Xu G, Jia J, Christakis NA. Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China. Nature 2020;582(7812):389-94. - PubMed
Johansson 2011 {published data only}
Joo 2019 {published data only}
Jungerman 2017 {published data only}
Kong 2020 {published data only}
-
- Kong XS, Liu F, Wang HB, Yang RF, Chen DB, Wang XX, et al. Epidemic prevention and control measures in China significantly curbed the epidemic of COVID-19 and influenza. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.09.20058859] - DOI
Kraemer 2020 {published data only}
Krisztin 2020 {published data only}
Lai CC 2020 {published data only}
-
- Lai CC, Hsu CY, Jen HH, Yen MF, Chan CC, Chen HH. Bayesian approach for modelling the dynamic of COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship. medRxiv 2020.
Lai S 2020a {published data only}
-
- Lai S, Bogoch I, Ruktanonchai N, Watts A, Lu X, Yang W, et al. Assessing spread risk of Wuhan novel coronavirus within and beyond China, January-April 2020: a travel network-based modelling study. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: ]
Lai S 2020b {published data only}
Lai S 2020c {published data only}
Lam 2020 {published data only}
Lau 2004 {published data only}
Lee 2020 {published data only}
Li H 2020 {published data only}
Lin YC 2020 {published data only}
Lin YH 2020 {published data only}
-
- Lin YH, Huang JY, Yu KD, Lu CM, Lee WP, Huang JJ, et al. Border quarantine measures and achievement of COVID-19 control in Taiwan. Epidemiology Bulletin 2020;36(15):87-8.
Li R 2020 {published data only}
Liu 2011 {published data only}
-
- Liu X, Chen X, Takeuchi Y. Dynamics of an SIQS epidemic model with transport-related infection and exit-entry screenings. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2011;285(1):25-35. - PubMed
Liu F 2020 {published data only}
Liu Q 2020 {published data only}
Luna 2007 {published data only}
Ma 2017 {published data only}
Maeno 2016 {published data only}
Magalis 2020 {published data only}
-
- Magalis BR, Ramirez-Mata A, Zhukova A, Mavian C, Marini S, Lemoine F, et al. Differing impacts of global and regional responses on SARS-CoV-2 transmission cluster dynamics. bioRxiv 2020.
Malmberg 2020 {published data only}
Marcelino 2012 {published data only}
Myers 2020 {published data only}
-
- Myers JF, Snyder RE, Porse CC, Tecle S, Lowenthal P, Danforth ME, et al. Identification and monitoring of international travelers during the initial phase of an outbreak of COVID-19 - California, February 3-March 17, 2020. MMWR - Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report 2020;69(19):599-602. - PubMed
Ng 2020a {published data only}
-
- Ng TCV, Cheng HY, Chang HH, Liu CC, Yang CC, Jian SW, et al. Effects of case- and population-based COVID-19 interventions in Taiwan. medRxiv 2020.
Nikolaou 2020 {published data only}
Niwa 2020 {published data only}
Pan 2020 {published data only}
-
- Pan W, Tyrovolas S, Vazquez IG, Raj R, Fernandez D, Zaitchik B, et al. COVID-19: Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States before phased removal of social distancing protections varies by region. medRxiv 2020.
Pitman 2005 {published data only}
Pullano 2020 {published data only}
Quilty 2020b {published data only}
-
- Quilty BJ, Diamond C, Liu Y, Gibbs H, Russell TW, Jarvis CI, et al. The effect of inter-city travel restrictions on geographical spread of COVID-19: evidence from Wuhan, China. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20067504] - DOI
Rajabi 2020 {published data only}
-
- Rajabi A, Mantzaris AV, Mutlu EC, Garibay I. Investigating dynamics of COVID-19 spread and containment with agent-based modeling. medRxiv 2020.
Ruktanonchai 2020 {published data only}
Ryu 2019 {published data only}
Shah 2020 {published data only}
Shumway 2020 {published data only}
Sriwijitalai 2020b {published data only}
Summan 2020 {published data only}
Sun 2013 {published data only}
-
- Sun G, Abe N, Sugiyama Y, Nguyen QV, Nozaki K, Nakayama Y, et al. Development of an infection screening system for entry inspection at airport quarantine stations using ear temperature, heart and respiration rates. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 2013;2013:6716-9. - PubMed
Thomas 2014 {published data only}
Valba 2020 {published data only}
-
- Valba O, Avetisov V, Gorsky A, Nechaev S. Self-isolation or borders closing: What prevents the spread of the epidemic better? Physical Review E 2020;102(1-1):010401. - PubMed
Wells 2020b {published data only}
Wickramaarachchi 2020 {published data only}
Yip 2007 {published data only}
-
- Yip PS, Hsieh YH, Xu Y, Lam KF, King CC, Chang HL. Assessment of intervention measures for the 2003 SARS epidemic in Taiwan by use of a back-projection method. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2007;28(5):525-30. - PubMed
Yuan 2020 {published data only}
-
- Yuan HY, Hossain MP, Tsegaye MM, Zhu X, Jia P, Wen TH, et al. Estimating the risk on outbreak spreading of 2019-nCoV in China using transportation data. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.01.20019984] - DOI
Zhao Q 2020 {published data only}
-
- Zhao Q, Chen Y, Small DS. Analysis of the epidemic growth of the early 2019-nCoV outbreak using internationally confirmed cases. medRxiv 2020. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.06.20020941] - DOI
Zhao Z 2020 {published data only}
Zheng 2020 {published data only}
-
- Zheng Y. Estimation of disease transmission in multimodal transportation networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2020;2020. [DOI: 10.1155/2020/8898923] - DOI
Additional references
Arshed 2020
Baba 2020
Brozek 2021
Byambasuren 2020
Cacciapaglia 2020a
Cacciapaglia 2020b
Campbell 2020
Carfi 2020
Caro 2014
-
- Caro JJ, Eddy DM, Kan H, Kaltz C, Patel B, Eldessouki R, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Modeling CER Task Forces. Questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modeling studies for informing health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value in Health 2014;17(2):174-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.01.003] - DOI - PubMed
Chang 2020
Chaudhry 2020
Chen 2020d
Dorjee 2020
Egger 2017
Errett 2020
-
- Errett NA, Sauer LM, Rutkow L. An integrative review of the limited evidence on international travel bans as an emerging infectious disease disaster control measure. Journal of Emergency Management 2020;18(1):7-14. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Expert‐Taskforce 2020
Fani 2020
-
- Fani M, Teimoori A, Ghafari S. Comparison of the COVID-2019 (SARS-CoV-2) pathogenesis with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections. Future Virology 2020;10(2217):fvl-2020-0050. [DOI: 10.2217/fvl-2020-0050] - DOI
Folayan 2015
Furukawa 2020
Garritty 2020
-
- Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Kamel C, King VJ, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Stevens A, et al. Cochrane rapid reviews. Interim guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (2020). methods.cochrane.org/rapidreviews/sites/methods.cochrane.org.rapidreview....
Greenhalgh 2020
-
- Greenhalgh T, Knight M, Court C, Buxton M, Husain L. Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care. BMJ 2020;370:m3026. - PubMed
Gupta 2020
Hayakawa 2020
HHS 2020
-
- US Department of Health & Human Services. What is the difference between isolation and quarantine? (2020). Available at www.hhs.gov/answers/public-health-and-safety/what-is-the-difference-betw....
Higgins 2019
-
- Higgins JP, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JA. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Hilton Boon 2020
Hultcrantz 2017
Ing 2020
Jablonska 2020
Jernigan 2020
Jorritsma 2020
Kiang 2020
Koh 2020
Leffler 2020
-
- Leffler CT, Ing E, Lykins JD, Hogan MC, McKeown CA, Grzybowski A. Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020;103(6):2153-4. [DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1342] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Liu 2020a
Moher 2009
Mouchtouri 2019
-
- Mouchtouri VA, Christoforidou EP, An der Heiden M, Menel Lemos C, Fanos M, Rexroth U, et al. Exit and entry screening practices for infectious diseases among travelers at points of entry: looking for evidence on public health impact. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health [Electronic Resource] 2019;16(23):21. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Movsisyan 2021
NICE 2020
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline [NG188]. 2020. - PubMed
Nussbaumer‐Streit 2020
Nuttal 2014
-
- Nuttal I. Ebola travel: vigilance, not bans (commentary) World Health Organization. www.who.int/mediacentre/commentaries/ebola-travel/en/ (accessed prior to 22 March 2021).
Nuzzo 2014
Ogundokun 2020
Ouzzani 2016
Philips 2006
Potdar 2020
Rees 2020
Schünemann 2008
-
- Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 2008;336(7653):1106-10. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Schünemann 2019
-
- Schünemann HJ, Cuello C, Akl EA, Mustafa RA, Meerpohl JJ, Thayer K, GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;111:105-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Sriwijitalai 2020a
Sterne 2016
Stokes 2020
Swadi 2021
Teixeira da Silva 2020
Tognotti 2013
Viswanathan 2020
Whiting 2011
WHO 2005
-
- World Health Organization. International Health Regulations. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
WHO 2019
-
- World Health Organization. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
WHO 2020a
-
- World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report - 1. Available from www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-... 2020.
WHO 2020b
-
- World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report - 51. Available from apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331475/nCoVsitrep11Mar2020-eng.... 2020.
References to other published versions of this review
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous