Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;66(1-2):195-211.
doi: 10.1111/jir.12833. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

Evaluating working memory outcome measures for children with Down syndrome

Affiliations

Evaluating working memory outcome measures for children with Down syndrome

E K Schworer et al. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: There is a critical need for the psychometric evaluation of outcome measures to be used in clinical trials targeting cognition in Down syndrome (DS). This study examines a specific cognitive skill that is of particular importance in DS, working memory, and the psychometric properties of a set of standardised measurements to assess working memory in individuals with DS.

Methods: Ninety children and adolescents ages 6 to 18 years old with DS were assessed on a selection of verbal and visuospatial working memory subtests of standardised clinical assessments at two time points to examine feasibility, distributional qualities, test-retest reliability and convergent validity against a priori criteria. Caregivers also completed an adaptive behaviour questionnaire to address working memory subtests' associations with broader developmental functioning.

Results: The Stanford Binet-5 Verbal Working Memory, Differential Ability Scales-2 Recognition of Pictures, Stanford Binet-5 Nonverbal Working Memory and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-5 Picture Span measures met the most psychometric criteria overall across the full age and IQ range of the study. Although Differential Ability Scales-2 Recall of Sequential Order and Differential Ability Scales-2 Recall of Digits Backward met the fewest a priori criteria, follow-up analyses suggested greater feasibility in specific age and IQ ranges.

Conclusions: Several working memory measures appear to be psychometrically sound and appropriate for use in clinical trials for children with DS, especially when focusing on raw scores. However, floor effects on standard scores and feasibility of some measures were problematic. Guidelines for use of the working memory subtests with this population are provided.

Keywords: Down syndrome; children; clinical trials; measurement; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Chronological age and FSIQ of completers and non-completers for DAS-2 Recall of Sequential Order
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Chronological age and FSIQ of completers and non-completers for DAS-2 Recall of Digits Backward

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akoglu H (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 18, 91–93. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley AD, & Hitch G (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 8, 47–89. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 - DOI
    1. Baddeley A, & Jarrold C (2007). Working memory and Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 51, 925–931. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.00979.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basten IA, Boada R, Taylor HG, Koenig K, Barrionuevo VL, Brandão AC, & Costa A (2018). On the design of broad-based neuropsychological test batteries to assess the cognitive abilities of individuals with down syndrome in the context of clinical trials. Brain Sciences, 8(12), 205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett SJ, Holmes J, & Buckley S (2013). Computerized memory training leads to sustained improvement in visuospatial short-term memory skills in children with Down syndrome. American Journal On Intellectual And Developmental Disabilities 118, 179–192. - PubMed

Publication types