Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e020019.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020019. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex-Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex-Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients

Aditi Nayak et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Prior studies have shown that women have worse 3-month survival after receiving a left ventricular assist device compared with men. Currently used prognostic scores, including the Heartmate II Risk Score, do not account for the increased residual risk in women. We used the IMACS (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry to create and validate a sex-specific risk score for early mortality in left ventricular assist device recipients. Methods and Results Adult patients with a continuous-flow LVAD from the IMACS registry were randomly divided into a derivation cohort (DC; n=9113; 21% female) and a validation cohort (VC; n=6074; 21% female). The IMACS Risk Score was developed in the DC to predict 3-month mortality, from preoperative candidate predictors selected using the Akaike information criterion, or significant sex × variable interaction. In the DC, age, cardiogenic shock at implantation, body mass index, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, hemoglobin, albumin, platelet count, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, tricuspid regurgitation, dialysis, and major infection before implantation were retained as significant predictors of 3-month mortality. There was significant ischemic heart failure × sex and platelet count × sex interaction. For each quartile increase in IMACS risk score, men (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.74-2.00; P<0.0001), and women (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.47-2.59; P<0.0001) had higher odds of 3-month mortality. The IMACS risk score represented a significant improvement over Heartmate II Risk Score (IMACS risk score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: men: DC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.73; VC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66-0.72; women: DC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.77; VC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76; P<0.01 for improvement in receiver operating characteristic) and provided excellent risk calibration in both sexes. Removal of sex-specific interaction terms resulted in significant loss of model fit. Conclusions A sex-specific risk score provides excellent risk prediction in LVAD recipients.

Keywords: left ventricular assist device; mortality; prognosis; risk score; sex disparity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Cowger is a speaker for Abbott and Medtronic, consultant for Medtronic, and a member of the IMACS steering committee. Dr Kirklin is the director of the Data Coordinating Center for Society of Thoracic Surgeons INTERMACS. Dr Simon reports research support from Novartis, Aadi, and consultancy fees from Complexa, Actelion, and United Therapeutics. Dr Kormos is an Abbott employee. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of derivation and validation of IMACS‐RS.
AIC indicates Akaike information criterion; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; DC, derivation cohort; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; IMACS, ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry; IMACS‐RS, ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry‐Risk Score; INR, international normalized ratio; ISHLT, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; HF, heart failure; HT, heart transplantation; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; MELD, model for end‐stage liver disease; NRI, Net Reclassification Index; PADP, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure; RAP, right atrial pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; and VC, validation cohort.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, De Ferranti S, Després J‐P, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131:434–441. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, Berkowitz RL, Galvao M, Horton DP; ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators . Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. 2005;149:209–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fonarow GC, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gattis Stough W, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg BH, O'Connor CM, Pieper K, Sun JL, Yancy CW, et al. Influence of a performance‐improvement initiative on quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure: results of the organized program to initiate lifesaving treatment in hospitalized patients with heart failure (OPTIMIZE‐HF). Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1493–1502. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.14.1493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook JL, Grady KL, Colvin M, Joseph SM, Brisco MA, Walsh MN; genVAD Working Group . Sex differences in the care of patients with advanced heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:S56–S59. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001730. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, Chandramouli C, Hilfiker‐Kleiner D, Kaye DM, Ky B, Santema BT, Sliwa K, Voors AA. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:3859–3868c. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types