Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;74(3):1429-1444.
doi: 10.1002/hep.31829.

Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations

Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Thomas Boerner et al. Hepatology. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background and aim: Genetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are increasingly well characterized, but their impact on outcome and prognosis remains unknown.

Approach and results: This bi-institutional study of patients with confirmed iCCA (n = 412) used targeted next-generation sequencing of primary tumors to define associations among genetic alterations, clinicopathological variables, and outcome. The most common oncogenic alterations were isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; 20%), AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (20%), tumor protein P53 (TP53; 17%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A; 15%), breast cancer 1-associated protein 1 (15%), FGFR2 (15%), polybromo 1 (12%), and KRAS (10%). IDH1/2 mutations (mut) were mutually exclusive with FGFR2 fusions, but neither was associated with outcome. For all patients, TP53 (P < 0.0001), KRAS (P = 0.0001), and CDKN2A (P < 0.0001) alterations predicted worse overall survival (OS). These high-risk alterations were enriched in advanced disease but adversely impacted survival across all stages, even when controlling for known correlates of outcome (multifocal disease, lymph node involvement, bile duct type, periductal infiltration). In resected patients (n = 209), TP53mut (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.06; P = 0.03) and CDKN2A deletions (del; HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.95-5.94; P < 0.001) independently predicted shorter OS, as did high-risk clinical variables (multifocal liver disease [P < 0.001]; regional lymph node metastases [P < 0.001]), whereas KRASmut (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97-2.93; P = 0.06) trended toward statistical significance. The presence of both or neither high-risk clinical or genetic factors represented outcome extremes (median OS, 18.3 vs. 74.2 months; P < 0.001), with high-risk genetic alterations alone (median OS, 38.6 months; 95% CI, 28.8-73.5) or high-risk clinical variables alone (median OS, 37.0 months; 95% CI, 27.6-not available) associated with intermediate outcome. TP53mut, KRASmut, and CDKN2Adel similarly predicted worse outcome in patients with unresectable iCCA. CDKN2Adel tumors with high-risk clinical features were notable for limited survival and no benefit of resection over chemotherapy.

Conclusions: TP53, KRAS, and CDKN2A alterations were independent prognostic factors in iCCA when controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, disease stage, and treatment. Because genetic profiling can be integrated into pretreatment therapeutic decision-making, combining clinical variables with targeted tumor sequencing may identify patient subgroups with poor outcome irrespective of treatment strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(A) OncoPrint representation of the genetic alterations occurring in the entire cohort (N = 412), including detailed breakdown of the RTK, RAS/RAF, and PI3K pathway genes, IDH1/2, and survival-associated genes. (B) Cox regression for overall survival by genetic features in all iCCA (N = 412, 287 events). Abbreviations: ARAF, A-Raf protooncogene; CBL, Cbl proto-oncogene; ERFFI1, ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1; NTRK, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; ROS1, ROS protooncogene 1; STK11, serine/threonine kinase 11; TSC1/2, TSC complex subunit 1/2.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Effect of TP53 (A), KRAS (B), CDKN2A (C), TERT (D), IDH1/2 (E), and FGFR2 (E) mutation status on overall survival in the whole cohort (N = 412, 287 events).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(A) Distribution of driver mutations or structural genetic alterations in iCCA occurring with a frequency of >5% in the entire cohort (N = 412), stratified by treatment group (resected and unresected). (B) Spider plot illustrating frequencies of alterations across 12 canonical signaling pathways in the entire cohort (N = 412), stratified by treatment group.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Univariable and multivariable analysis of genetic and clinicopathological features with RFS and OS in (A,B) resected and (C,D) unresected patients. (A) Univariable analysis of genetic features in resected patients (n = 209, 166 RFS events, 130 OS events). (B) Multivariable analysis of clinicopathological and genetic features in resected patients (n = 198). (C) Univariable analysis of genetic features in unresectable patients (n = 203, 157 events). (D) Multivariable analysis of clinicopathological and genetic features in unresectable patients (n = 203). P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons within outcome using the false discovery rate correction. Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate; M stage=metastatic disease.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Effect of clinical and genetic high-risk group (TP53/KRAS/CDKN2A alterations) on (A) RFS (n = 209, 166 events) and (B) OS (n = 209, 130 events) after resection. (C) OS stratified by genetic risk groups and disease extent (locally advanced vs. metastatic, n = 203, 157 events) in patients with unresectable disease. (D) OS by CDKN2Adel status in resected/unresected patients of similar disease extent: resected clinical high-risk (n = 77) and unresected locally advanced (n = 103).

References

    1. Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, Brooks GA. Forty-year trends in cholangiocarcinoma incidence in the U.S.: intrahepatic disease on the rise. Oncologist 2016;21:594–599. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 2001;33:1353–1357. - PubMed
    1. Brandi G, Farioli A, Astolfi A, Biasco G, Tavolari SJO. Genetic heterogeneity in cholangiocarcinoma: a major challenge for targeted therapies. Oncotarget 2015;6:14744. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doussot A, Groot-Koerkamp B, Wiggers JK, Chou J, Gonen M, DeMatteo RP, et al. Outcomes after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: external validation and comparison of prognostic models. J Am Coll Surg 2015;221:452–461. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abou-Alfa GK, Sahai V, Hollebecque A, Vaccaro G, Melisi D, Al-Rajabi R, et al. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:671–684. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms