Development of a deep learning-based image quality control system to detect and filter out ineligible slit-lamp images: A multicenter study
- PMID: 33765481
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106048
Development of a deep learning-based image quality control system to detect and filter out ineligible slit-lamp images: A multicenter study
Abstract
Background and objective: Previous studies developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic systems only using eligible slit-lamp images for detecting corneal diseases. However, images of ineligible quality (including poor-field, defocused, and poor-location images), which are inevitable in the real world, can cause diagnostic information loss and thus affect downstream AI-based image analysis. Manual evaluation for the eligibility of slit-lamp images often requires an ophthalmologist, and this procedure can be time-consuming and labor-intensive when applied on a large scale. Here, we aimed to develop a deep learning-based image quality control system (DLIQCS) to automatically detect and filter out ineligible slit-lamp images (poor-field, defocused, and poor-location images).
Methods: We developed and externally evaluated the DLIQCS based on 48,530 slit-lamp images (19,890 individuals) that were derived from 4 independent institutions using different types of digital slit lamp cameras. To find the best deep learning model for the DLIQCS, we used 3 algorithms (AlexNet, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3) to train models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were leveraged to assess the performance of each algorithm for the classification of poor-field, defocused, poor-location, and eligible images.
Results: In an internal test dataset, the best algorithm DenseNet121 had AUCs of 0.999, 1.000, 1.000, and 1.000 in the detection of poor-field, defocused, poor-location, and eligible images, respectively. In external test datasets, the AUCs of the best algorithm DenseNet121 for identifying poor-field, defocused, poor-location, and eligible images were ranged from 0.997 to 0.997, 0.983 to 0.995, 0.995 to 0.998, and 0.999 to 0.999, respectively.
Conclusions: Our DLIQCS can accurately detect poor-field, defocused, poor-location, and eligible slit-lamp images in an automated fashion. This system may serve as a prescreening tool to filter out ineligible images and enable that only eligible images would be transferred to the subsequent AI diagnostic systems.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Image quality; Slit lamp.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest.
Similar articles
-
Development of a deep learning-based image eligibility verification system for detecting and filtering out ineligible fundus images: A multicentre study.Int J Med Inform. 2021 Mar;147:104363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104363. Epub 2020 Dec 13. Int J Med Inform. 2021. PMID: 33388480
-
Integrating prior knowledge with deep learning for optimized quality control in corneal images: A multicenter study.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jul;267:108814. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108814. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025. PMID: 40319841
-
Deep Learning-Based Cataract Detection and Grading from Slit-Lamp and Retro-Illumination Photographs: Model Development and Validation Study.Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Mar 18;2(2):100147. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2022.100147. eCollection 2022 Jun. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36249697 Free PMC article.
-
Updates in Diagnostic Imaging for Infectious Keratitis: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;13(21):3358. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213358. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37958254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Are the Applications and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Fracture Detection and Classification in Orthopaedic Trauma Imaging? A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2482-2491. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000848. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 31283727 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of deep learning systems and cornea specialists in detecting corneal diseases from low-quality images.iScience. 2021 Oct 22;24(11):103317. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103317. eCollection 2021 Nov 19. iScience. 2021. PMID: 34778732 Free PMC article.
-
Large language model-based multimodal system for detecting and grading ocular surface diseases from smartphone images.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 May 23;13:1600202. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1600202. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025. PMID: 40486905 Free PMC article.
-
Trustworthy in silico cell labeling via ensemble-based image translation.Biophys Rep (N Y). 2023 Oct 18;3(4):100133. doi: 10.1016/j.bpr.2023.100133. eCollection 2023 Dec 13. Biophys Rep (N Y). 2023. PMID: 38026685 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of artificial intelligence algorithms in automatic segmentation for fungal keratitis diagnosis by anterior segment images.Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 8;17:1195188. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1195188. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37360182 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: The path to the real-world clinic.Cell Rep Med. 2023 Jul 18;4(7):101095. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101095. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Cell Rep Med. 2023. PMID: 37385253 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources