Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):251.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0.

A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA)

Bertrand Gachon  1   2   3 , Thomas Schmitz  4 , France Artzner  5 , Olivier Parant  6 , Renaud De Tayrac  7 , Guillaume Ducarme  8 , Camille Le Ray  9 , Anne Cécile Pizzoferrato  10 , Charles Garabedian  11 , Didier Riethmuller  12 , Fabrice Pierre  13 , Stephanie Ragot  14 , Xavier Fritel  13   14 ; GROG (Groupe de Recherche en Gynécologie Obstétrique)
Affiliations

A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA)

Bertrand Gachon et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: We aimed at developing a core outcome and variables of interest set to investigate the effects of mediolateral episiotomy on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) during and after operative delivery in nulliparous women in a large-scale one-year observational French study including 15,000 women (INSTRUMODA).

Methods: A list of outcomes and variables of interest was suggested to obstetricians participating in the INSTRUMODA study using online questionnaires divided into 7 categories: the woman's history and course of pregnancy, course of labor, modalities of operative delivery, episiotomy characteristics, immediate maternal morbidity, one-year maternal morbidity, immediate neonatal morbidity. We used a three-round DELPHI method to reach a consensus. In the first round, outcomes and variables considered as essential by 70% or more of obstetricians were included in the corpus whereas they were excluded when 70% rated them as "not important". In the second round, non-consensual outcomes and variables were reassessed and excluded or definitively included if considered as "not important" or essential by 50% or more of the obstetricians. During the first round, obstetricians were invited to suggest new outcomes and/or variables that were then assessed in the second and third round. We used the same method to develop a core outcome and variables of interest set in a population of women in the community recruited via an association of patients. At the end of the procedure the core outcome and variables of interest sets were merged to provide the final core outcome set for the INSTRUMODA study.

Results: Fifty-three obstetricians and 16 women filled out questionnaires. After the 3 rounds of Delphi procedure in each population, 74 outcomes and variables were consensually reported by obstetricians and 92 by women in the community. By mixing these two consensual corpora we reported a final consensual list of 114 variables of interest and outcomes for both obstetricians and women.

Conclusion: We established a core outcome and variables of interest set among obstetricians and women in the community to investigate the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI during operative delivery.

Trial registration: The INSTRUMODA study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov on June 25, 2020 ( NCT04446780 ).

Keywords: Core outcome set; Episiotomy; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Operative delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow Chart for the consensus process in the group of professionals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow Chart for the consensus process in the group of women
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Green-top Guideline No. 29. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. 2015.
    1. Ducarme G, Pizzoferrato AC, de Tayrac R, Schantz C, Thubert T, le Ray C, Riethmuller D, Verspyck E, Gachon B, Pierre F, Artzner F, Jacquetin B, Fritel X. Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF clinical practice guidelines. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(7):455–460. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fritel X, Gachon B, Desseauve D, Thubert T. Anal incontinence and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, epidemiology and prevention. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(4):419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gachon B, Fradet Menard C, Pierre F, Fritel X. Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(1):87–94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05174-0. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data