Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00745-y.

Short-form quality care questionnaire-palliative care has acceptable measurement properties in Brazilian cancer patients

Affiliations

Short-form quality care questionnaire-palliative care has acceptable measurement properties in Brazilian cancer patients

Vinício Dos Santos Barros et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Our objective was to perform the translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC) into Brazilian Portuguese for cancer patients in palliative care. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation comprised the following stages: translation, synthesis of translations, back-translation, analysis by a committee of experts, testing of the pre-final version, and definition of the final version. The evaluated measurement properties were: structural validity using factor analysis, test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity using the correlations between the QCQ-PC and other questionnaires already validated in Brazil.

Results: Two hundred and twenty-five cancer patients were included for validity analyses, and a subsample of 30 patients was used for test-retest reliability. The most adequate fit indexes were for the short version of the QCQ-PC (SF-QCQ-PC), with two domains and 12 items. There was adequate reliability and internal consistency, with values of the ICC ≥ 0.83 and Cronbach's alpha ≥0.82. There were correlations > 0.30 between the SF-QCQ-PC and the Karnofsky Performance Scale, the Palliative Prognostic Index, the sadness domain of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, the Barthel Index, and all domains related to the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire and the European Organization for Research in the Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire-core.

Conclusion: The short version of the SF-QCQ-PC has acceptable psychometric properties for use in Brazil.

Keywords: Palliative care; Quality of health care; Surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scree plot with the definition of two factors by the parallel analysis of the Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (QCQ-PC)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Path diagram with factor loads for each domain of the Short-Form Quality Care Questionnaire-Palliative Care (SF-QCQ-PC). F1: Communication with health professionals; F2: Care and assistance provided by health professionals

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Celis ESP, Chavarri-Guerra Y, P. T, Ruiz-Mendoza R, Bukowski A, Goss PE. End-of-life Care in Latin America. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(3):261–270. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.005579. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ANCP - Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos . Manual de Cuidados Paliativos ANCP Ampliado e atualizado. 2. São Paulo: ANCP; 2012. pp. 1–592.
    1. Nunes NAH. The quality of life of Brazilian patients in palliative care: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire Core 15 PAL (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(6):1595–1600. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2119-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eluf-Neto J. Cross-cultural validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the McGill quality of life questionnaire. Palliat Med Care Open Access. 2014;1(3):7.
    1. Aslakson RA, Dy SM, Wilson RF, et al. Patient- and caregiver-reported assessment tools for palliative care: summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality technical brief. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(6):961–972.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.022. - DOI - PubMed