Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Mar 25;9(1):73.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01023-y.

Phylogenetic Core Groups: a promising concept in search of a consistent methodological framework : Comment to ``A conceptual framework for the phylogenetically-constrained assembly of microbial communities''

Affiliations
Comment

Phylogenetic Core Groups: a promising concept in search of a consistent methodological framework : Comment to ``A conceptual framework for the phylogenetically-constrained assembly of microbial communities''

Alberto Pascual-García. Microbiome. .

Abstract

In this comment, we analyse the conceptual framework proposed by Aguirre de Cárcer (Microbiome 7:142, 2019), introducing the novel concept of Phylogenetic Core Groups (PCGs). This notion aims to complement the traditional classification in operational taxonomic units (OTUs), widely used in microbial ecology, to provide a more intrinsic taxonomical classification which avoids the use of pre-determined thresholds. However, to introduce this concept, the author frames his proposal in a wider theoretical framework based on a conceptualization of selection that we argue is a tautology. This blurs the subsequent formulation of an assembly principle for microbial communities, favouring that some contradictory examples introduced to support the framework appear aligned in their conclusions. And more importantly, under this framework and its derived methodology, it is not possible to infer PCGs from data in a consistent way. We reanalyse the proposal to identify its logical and methodological flaws and, through the analysis of synthetic scenarios, we propose a number of methodological refinements to contribute towards the determination of PCGs in a consistent way. We hope our analysis will promote the exploration of PCGs as a potentially valuable tool, helping to bridge the gap between environmental conditions and community composition in microbial ecology. Video Abstract.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.P-G. is named researcher in the project BIO2016-80101-R awarded to Aguirre de Cárcer. A.P-G. does not perceive any retribution for his participation in the project. Aguirre de Cárcer had no role in the preparation of this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Analysis of synthetic scenarios. Two evolutionary histories (left column) of four species with traits, either appearing through duplication and divergent selection (case A), or also considering convergence and horizontal gene transfer (case B). The different scenarios take sampled niches (described by the traits which are needed to inhabit them) and, depending on the OTUs found and on the analysis of neutrality, the inferred PCGs and types of niches are shown. These scenarios are analysed in detail in the main text
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of the proposed methodology. Starting from a regional pool of species (top), the immigration rate (turnover high or low) and the environmental filtering determine the species that can be observed. The environment may be homogeneous (coloured rectangles), heterogeneous (triangles), or may be shaped by continuous transformations due to strong feedbacks with the microbial activity (cyclic arrows). Sampling these environments, classifying the samples into classes, and performing neutrality tests will lead to a classification of environments into different types of niches

Comment on

References

    1. Lewin R. Santa Rosalia was a goat. Science. 1983;221(4611):636–9. doi: 10.1126/science.221.4611.636. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cody ML, MacArthur RH, Diamond JM, et al. Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1975.
    1. Connor EF, Simberloff D. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology. 1979;60(6):1132–40. doi: 10.2307/1936961. - DOI
    1. Gotelli NJ, McGill BJ. Null versus neutral models: what’s the difference? Ecography. 2006;29(5):793–800. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04714.x. - DOI
    1. Hubbell SP. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (MPB-32) Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2001.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources