Insight into the current practice of ototoxicity monitoring during cisplatin therapy
- PMID: 33766142
- PMCID: PMC7995701
- DOI: 10.1186/s40463-021-00506-0
Insight into the current practice of ototoxicity monitoring during cisplatin therapy
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the current state of ototoxicity monitoring for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy in an academic medical center with particular attention to how closely monitoring adheres to national ototoxicity guidelines.
Methods: Case series including retrospective medical records review of patients (age > 18) treated with cisplatin at University of California Davis Medical Center between January 2014 and August 2017. Patient and ototoxicity related variables were analyzed. Patients that underwent a transfer of care during treatment and with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded.
Results: Three hundred seventy-nine patients met study criteria, of which 104 (27.4%) had a prior history of hearing loss. Prior to treatment, 196 (51.7%) patients were counseled regarding the ototoxic nature of cisplatin and 92 (24.3%) patients had a pretreatment audiogram. During treatment, 91 (24%) patients had documented otologic complaints. Only 17 patients (4.5%) patients had an audiogram ordered during their cisplatin treatment period. 130 (34.3%) patients had otologic complaints following cisplatin treatment. Audiograms were ordered for 20 (7.8%), 13 (5.1%), and 16 (6.2%) patients at 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups, respectively. No patients in the study cohort received baseline, treatment, and post-treatment audiograms as recommended by national ototoxicity monitoring protocols. Patients with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) represented the largest subgroup that received cisplatin (n = 122, 32.2%) and demonstrated higher rates of ototoxicity counseling (n = 103, 84.4%) and pretreatment audiograms (n = 70, 57.4%) compared to the non HNC group (n = 36, 36.2%, P < 0.0001 and n = 22, 8.5%, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: There is poor adherence to national ototoxicity monitoring guidelines at a large academic medical center. This is a missed opportunity for intervention and aural rehabilitation. Improved education and collaboration between otolaryngology, audiology, and medical oncology is needed to develop and promote an effective ototoxicity-monitoring program.
Keywords: Audiogram; Audiologic; Cisplatin; Hearing loss; Monitoring Program; Otologic; Ototoxicity; Quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Audiologic Follow-up in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Cisplatin and Radiation.Laryngoscope. 2023 Nov;133(11):3161-3168. doi: 10.1002/lary.30682. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Laryngoscope. 2023. PMID: 36995150 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in ototoxicity monitoring among cisplatin-treated patients with cancer.J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01586-3. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Surviv. 2024. PMID: 38630333
-
Development and validation of a cisplatin dose-ototoxicity model.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(7):510-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.3. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22992258 Free PMC article.
-
Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions.Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S3-S18. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1398421. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 29157038 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ototoxicity monitoring in children treated with platinum chemotherapy.Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S34-S40. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1355570. Epub 2017 Jul 24. Int J Audiol. 2018. PMID: 28737048 Review.
Cited by
-
Survivors' perspectives on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and barriers to ototoxicity monitoring.J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01860-y. Online ahead of print. J Cancer Surviv. 2025. PMID: 40601160
-
Mobile Audiometry for Use in Ototoxicity Monitoring Programs: A Scoping Review.J Audiol Otol. 2025 Jul;29(3):166-180. doi: 10.7874/jao.2024.00815. Epub 2025 Jul 18. J Audiol Otol. 2025. PMID: 40739933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving the usability of grading scales for drug-induced ototoxicity with a focus on real world data collection.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun;282(6):3343-3347. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09412-x. Epub 2025 May 9. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40346416 Free PMC article.
-
Ototoxicity Monitoring: The Evolution of a Protocol for Head and Neck Cancer Patients.OTO Open. 2025 Apr 7;9(2):e70070. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70070. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. OTO Open. 2025. PMID: 40196215 Free PMC article.
-
Oncologists' views on ototoxicity monitoring in head and neck cancer patients: A South Indian qualitative study.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0312847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312847. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39752438 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steffens LVK, O’Beirne GA, Kelly-Campbell R, Gibbs D, Bird P. The current state of otoxocicity monitoring in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2014;127(1398):84–97. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous