A mixed-methods pilot study of handheld fan for breathlessness in interstitial lung disease
- PMID: 33767311
- PMCID: PMC7994303
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86326-8
A mixed-methods pilot study of handheld fan for breathlessness in interstitial lung disease
Abstract
Dyspnoea is a cardinal symptom of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), with a lack of proven effective therapies. With emerging evidence of the role of facial and nasal airflow for relieving breathlessness, this pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility of conducting a clinical trial of a handheld fan (HHF) for dyspnoea management in patients with fibrotic ILD. In this mixed-methods, randomised, assessor-blinded, controlled trial, 30 participants with fibrotic ILD who were dyspnoeic with a modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea grade ≥ 2 were randomised to a HHF for symptom control or no intervention for 2 weeks. Primary outcomes were trial feasibility, change in Dyspnoea-12 scores at Week 2, and participants' perspectives on using a HHF for dyspnoea management. Study recruitment was completed within nine months at a single site. Successful assessor blinding was achieved in the fan group [Bang's Blinding Index - 0.08 (95% CI - 0.45, 0.30)] but not the control group [0.47 (0.12, 0.81)]. There were no significant between-group differences for the change in Dyspnoea-12 or secondary efficacy outcomes. During qualitative interviews, participants reported that using the HHF relieved breathlessness and provided relaxation, despite initial scepticism about its therapeutic benefit. Oxygen-experienced participants described the HHF being easier to use, but not as effective for symptomatic relief, compared to oxygen therapy. Our results confirmed the feasibility of a clinical trial of a HHF in fibrotic ILD. There was a high level of patient acceptance of a HHF for managing dyspnoea, with patients reporting both symptomatic benefits and ease of use.
Conflict of interest statement
Y.H.K. and N.S.L.G. report non-financial support from Air Liquide Healthcare, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. A.E.H. reports grants from Roche, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from BOC Healthcare and Air Liquide Healthcare, outside the submitted work. C.F.M. reports personal fees from GSK and Novartis, other from Menarini and Air Liquide Healthcare, and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. C.J.R. reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, outside the submitted work.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical