Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;86(1):65-95.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09751-8. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection

Affiliations

Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection

Elena Geminiani et al. Psychometrika. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Penalized factor analysis is an efficient technique that produces a factor loading matrix with many zero elements thanks to the introduction of sparsity-inducing penalties within the estimation process. However, sparse solutions and stable model selection procedures are only possible if the employed penalty is non-differentiable, which poses certain theoretical and computational challenges. This article proposes a general penalized likelihood-based estimation approach for single- and multiple-group factor analysis models. The framework builds upon differentiable approximations of non-differentiable penalties, a theoretically founded definition of degrees of freedom, and an algorithm with integrated automatic multiple tuning parameter selection that exploits second-order analytical derivative information. The proposed approach is evaluated in two simulation studies and illustrated using a real data set. All the necessary routines are integrated into the R package penfa.

Keywords: effective degrees of freedom; generalized information criterion; measurement invariance; penalized likelihood; simple structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19(6):716–723.
    1. Arminger G, Schoenberg RJ. Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation and a test for misspecification in mean and covariance structure models. Psychometrika. 1989;54(3):409–425.
    1. Bai J, Liao Y. Efficient estimation of approximate factor models via penalized maximum likelihood. Journal of Econometrics. 2016;191(1):1–18.
    1. Bauer DJ, Belzak WCM, Cole VT. Simplifying the assessment of measurement invariance over multiple background variables: Using regularized moderated nonlinear factor analysis to detect differential item functioning. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2020;27(1):43–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browne MW. An overviewof analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2001;36(1):111–150.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources