"VirtualBasket" ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes
- PMID: 33769013
- DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04025-X
"VirtualBasket" ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes
Abstract
Background: The "VirtualBasket" technology (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) is the result of pulse modulation during holmium laser emission: the laser emits part of the energy to create an initial bubble, and a second pulse is emitted when the vapor bubble is at its maximum expansion, so that it can pass through the previously created vapor channel. The aim of this study was to outline the outcomes of the "VirtualBasket" technology in ureteral and renal stones.
Methods: 160 Patients were randomly assigned to holmium laser lithotripsy with or without the "VirtualBasket" technology in ureteric or renal cases (40 per 4 groups). All procedures were performed by four experienced urologists. The Quanta System Cyber Ho 100W laser generator with 365 µm fibers was used for all the ureteral cases, whereas 272 µm fibers were used for all the cases in the renal pelvis. Demographic data, stone parameters, perioperative complications and success rates were compared. A statistical analysis was carried out to assess patients' data and outcomes. All the reported P values were obtained with the two-sided exact method at the conventional 5% significance level. The degree of stone retropulsion was graded on a Likert scale from zero (no retropulsion) to 3 (maximum retropulsion).
Results: All groups were comparable in terms of age, and preoperative stone size (ureter stone size: 1.2 vs. 1.1 cm; renal pelvis stone size: 1.55 vs. 1.62 cm). Compared to the regular mode, the "VirtualBasket" technology was associated with significantly lower fragmentation time (mean time for ureteral stones: 20.4 vs. 16.1 minutes, P<0.05; mean time for renal stones: 28.7 vs. 19.8 minutes, P<0.05) and total procedural time (mean time for ureteral stones 49 vs. 35.7 minutes; mean time for renal stones 67.1 vs. 52.4 minutes). There were no significant differences in terms of energy delivered to the stones, intraoperative complications and success rate at 1 month. The "VirtualBasket" technology was associated with significantly lower retropulsion.
Conclusions: The "VirtualBasket" technology is associated with significantly lower fragmentation and procedural times. The reduced fragmentation time is a result of the significantly lower retropulsion of the stones during laser lithotripsy, which improves stone fragmentation efficiency.
Comment in
-
Comment on: ""VirtualBasket" ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes".Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jun;74(3):379-380. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04961-8. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 35607788 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A comparison between vapor tunnel and virtual basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones using holmium:YAG laser (Cyber Ho): which is the best tool to reduce retropulsion?World J Urol. 2024 Apr 20;42(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04961-y. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38642145 Clinical Trial.
-
Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.J Endourol. 2020 May;34(5):624-628. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0695. Epub 2020 Apr 3. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 32143552 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the new Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology: the first clinical experience from a multicenter study.World J Urol. 2025 Apr 15;43(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05603-7. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40232519
-
Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.Urol Int. 2009;82(3):356-60. doi: 10.1159/000209372. Epub 2009 May 11. Urol Int. 2009. PMID: 19440028 Review.
-
Emerging Laser Techniques for the Management of Stones.Urol Clin North Am. 2019 May;46(2):193-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Mar 4. Urol Clin North Am. 2019. PMID: 30961853 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Ho:YAG laser on kidney tissue with Virtual Basket™ and Bubble Blast™ pulse modulation: an experimental ex vivo study.World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3091-3095. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04555-0. Epub 2023 Aug 7. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37550550
-
Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.Urolithiasis. 2023 Jan 17;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01402-6. Urolithiasis. 2023. PMID: 36648558 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review.World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3817-3827. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04669-5. Epub 2023 Oct 31. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 37906263
-
A comparison between vapor tunnel and virtual basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones using holmium:YAG laser (Cyber Ho): which is the best tool to reduce retropulsion?World J Urol. 2024 Apr 20;42(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04961-y. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38642145 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the effects of Ho: YAG laser virtual Basket™ pulse modulation and Thulium fiber laser on kidney tissue - an ex vivo experimental study.Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 19;39(1):185. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04137-5. Lasers Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39026130
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources