Response to Clayman re: "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones"
- PMID: 33769082
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.29109.jds
Response to Clayman re: "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones"
Comment on
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones.J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):417-428. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0915. Epub 2020 Nov 16. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 33076706
-
Editorial Comment on: "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Fluoroless Ureteroscopy and Conventional Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral and Renal Stones" by Subiela et al.J Endourol. 2021 Apr;35(4):463-464. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1060. Epub 2020 Nov 20. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 33121285 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
