Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;113(6):699-709.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa163.

Long-Term Risk of Ovarian Cancer and Borderline Tumors After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Affiliations

Long-Term Risk of Ovarian Cancer and Borderline Tumors After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Mandy Spaan et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Long-term effects of assisted reproductive technology (ART) on ovarian tumor risk are unknown.

Methods: This nationwide cohort study comprises 30 625 women who received ovarian stimulation for ART in 1983-2000 and 9988 subfertile women not treated with ART. Incident invasive and borderline ovarian tumors were ascertained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Pathology Registry until July 2018. Ovarian tumor risk in ART-treated women was compared with risks in the general population and the subfertile non-ART group. Statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results: After a median follow-up of 24 years, 158 invasive and 100 borderline ovarian tumors were observed. Ovarian cancer risk in the ART group was increased compared with the general population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 to 1.71) but not when compared with the non-ART group (age- and parity-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.50). Risk decreased with higher parity and with a larger number of successful ART cycles (resulting in childbirth, Ptrend = .001) but was not associated with the number of unsuccessful ART cycles. Borderline ovarian tumor risk was increased in ART-treated women compared with the general population (SIR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.86) and with non-ART women (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.08 to 3.14). Risk did not increase with more ART cycles or longer follow-up time.

Conclusions: Increased ovarian cancer risk in ART-treated women compared with the general population is likely explained by nulliparity rather than ART treatment. The increased risk of borderline ovarian tumors after ART must be interpreted with caution because no dose-response relationship was observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of OMEGA-I and OMEGA-II cohort. aWomen in this category contributed person-time from the first assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment or first gynecological visit until date of death.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fathalla MF. Incessant ovulation and ovarian cancer - a hypothesis re-visited. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2013;5(4):292–297. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li LL, Zhou J, Qian XJ, et al. Meta-analysis on the possible association between in vitro fertilization and cancer risk. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(1):16–24. - PubMed
    1. Reigstad MM, Larsen IK, Myklebust TA, et al. Cancer risk among parous women following assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(8):1952–1963. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Leeuwen FE, Klip H, Mooij TM, et al. Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3456–3465. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reigstad MM, Storeng R, Myklebust TA, et al. Cancer risk in women treated with fertility drugs according to parity status—a registry-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(6):953–962. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types