Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry
- PMID: 33769540
- PMCID: PMC8418423
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab050
Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry
Abstract
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been demonstrated to identify women of European, Asian, and Latino ancestry at elevated risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the performance of existing PRSs trained in European ancestry populations among women of African ancestry.
Methods: We assembled genotype data for women of African ancestry, including 9241 case subjects and 10 193 control subjects. We evaluated associations of 179- and 313-variant PRSs with overall and subtype-specific BC risk. PRS discriminatory accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also evaluated a recalibrated PRS, replacing the index variant with variants in each region that better captured risk in women of African ancestry and estimated lifetime absolute risk of BC in African Americans by PRS category.
Results: For overall BC, the odds ratio per SD of the 313-variant PRS (PRS313) was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23 to 1.31), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.571 (95% CI = 0.562 to 0.579). Compared with women with average risk (40th-60th PRS percentile), women in the top decile of PRS313 had a 1.54-fold increased risk (95% CI = 1.38-fold to 1.72-fold). By age 85 years, the absolute risk of overall BC was 19.6% for African American women in the top 1% of PRS313 and 6.7% for those in the lowest 1%. The recalibrated PRS did not improve BC risk prediction.
Conclusion: The PRSs stratify BC risk in women of African ancestry, with attenuated performance compared with that reported in European, Asian, and Latina populations. Future work is needed to improve BC risk stratification for women of African ancestry.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Comment in
-
Do Breast Cancer Risk Scores Work for You?J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Sep 4;113(9):1118-1119. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab052. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 33769538 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- P30 ES010126/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- Z01 ES044005/ImNIH/Intramural NIH HHS/United States
- 16565/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- T32 GM008692/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States
- P50 CA058223/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA228198/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA058420/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 16563/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- U19 CA148065/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P2C HD050924/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA228357/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA202981/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 16561/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- U01 CA164974/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA098663/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
