Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1314-1318.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000629.

Detection of postlaser vision correction ectasia with a new combined biomechanical index

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Detection of postlaser vision correction ectasia with a new combined biomechanical index

Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: To validate and evaluate the use of a new biomechanical index known as the Corvis biomechanical index-laser vision correction (CBI-LVC) as a method for separating stable post-LVC eyes from post-LVC eyes with ectasia.

Setting: 10 clinics from 9 countries.

Design: Retrospective, multicenter, clinical study.

Methods: The study was designed with 2 purposes: to develop the CBI-LVC, which combines dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters provided by a high-speed dynamic Scheimpflug camera (CorVis ST; OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH) and then to evaluate its ability to detect post-LVC ectasia. The CBI-LVC includes integrated inverse radius, applanation 1 (A1) velocity, A1 deflection amplitude, highest concavity and arclength, deformation amplitude ratio of 2 mm, and A1 arclength in millimeters. Logistic regression with Wald forward stepwise approach was used to identify the optimal combination of DCRs to create the CBI-LVC and then separate stable from LVC-induced ectasia. Eighty percentage of the database was used for training the software and 20% for validation.

Results: 736 eyes of 736 patients were included (685 stable LVC and 51 post-LVC ectasia). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.991 when applying CBI-LVC in the validation dataset and 0.998 in the training dataset. A cutoff of 0.2 was able to separate stable LVC from ectasia with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 97.8%.

Conclusions: The CBI-LVC was highly sensitive and specific in distinguishing stable from ectatic post-LVC eyes. Using CBI-LVC in routine practice, along with topography and tomography, can aid the early diagnosis of post-LVC ectasia and allow intervention prior to visually compromising progression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kim TI, Alio Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet 2019;393:2085–2098
    1. Rao SN, Epstein RJ. Early onset ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusus: case report and literature review. J Refract Surg 2002;18:177–184
    1. Giri P, Azar DT. Risk profiles of ectasia after keratorefractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017;28:337–342
    1. Rabinowitz YS. Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:421–426
    1. Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:406–412

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources