Effect of listing strategies on utilization of antitumor necrosis factor biologics infliximab and etanercept: a cross-sectional analysis from Ontario, Canada
- PMID: 33769851
- PMCID: PMC10391289
- DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.444
Effect of listing strategies on utilization of antitumor necrosis factor biologics infliximab and etanercept: a cross-sectional analysis from Ontario, Canada
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of costly biologic drugs for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases has increased significantly in recent years. However, biosimilar drugs offer an opportunity to ensure health system sustainability with robust uptake. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of formulary listing strategies on the use of infliximab and etanercept innovator and biosimilar biologics. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of individuals in Ontario, Canada, dispensed a biologic prescription for infliximab or etanercept through Ontario's public drug program between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019. Quarterly utilization and costs were forecasted using Holt-Winters' exponential smoothing models to the second quarter (Q2) of 2022. Secondary analyses explored utilization for rheumatic conditions (RC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). RESULTS: From Q1 2010 to Q2 2019, infliximab and etanercept users increased by 75.7% (n = 4,073 to 7,158), with a forecasted increase of 13.7% (n = 8,142; 95% CI = 7,438-8,847) by Q2 2022. Biosimilar users represented 13.8% (n = 539 of 3,905) of total infliximab users in Q2 2019, although this differed by indication with 6.9% for IBD (n = 187 of 2,712) and 26.6% for RC (n = 203 of 764). Etanercept biosimilar users represented 20.2% (n = 659 of 3,256) of total etanercept users for RC in Q2 2019. Biologics expenditures increased 109.7% during the study, amounting to $49.9 million in Q2 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differing reimbursement restrictions between innovator infliximab and etanercept biologics, the uptake of their biosimilars was low and not noticeably different in the treatment of RC. Dynamic policy strategies are needed to improve the uptake of biosimilars, particularly for IBD. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was contributed by the Ontario Ministry of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding for this study was contributed by the Ontario Ministry of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Treatment retention of infliximab and etanercept originators versus their corresponding biosimilars: Nordic collaborative observational study of 2334 biologics naïve patients with spondyloarthritis.RMD Open. 2019 Oct 23;5(2):e001079. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001079. eCollection 2019. RMD Open. 2019. PMID: 31749988 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Cost Implications of Mandatory Non-Medical Switching Policies for Biologics for Rheumatic Conditions and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):739-745. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2042. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021. PMID: 32909249
-
Projected impact of biosimilar substitution policies on drug use and costs in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional time series analysis.CMAJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;9(4):E1055-E1062. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210091. Print 2021 Oct-Dec. CMAJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34815261 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab versus adalimumab, etanercept and intravenous infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;17(1):85-99. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2020.1858803. Epub 2020 Dec 28. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33305638
-
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37234004 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Uptake of biosimilar drugs in Canada: analysis of provincial policies and usage data.CMAJ. 2022 Apr 19;194(15):E556-E560. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211478. CMAJ. 2022. PMID: 35440506 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Health Canada. Biosimilar biologic drugs in Canada: fact sheet. August 23, 2019. Accessed February 27, 2021. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/dhp-mps/alt_form...
-
- Canadian Institute for Health Information. Prescribed Drug Spending in Canada, 2019: A Focus on Public Drug Programs. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2019. Accessed March 8, 2021. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/pdex-report-2019-en-web...
-
- Patented Prices Review Board. Poster 8. Biosimilars in Canada: current environment and future opportunity. PDF-647 KB. Modified October 29, 2019. Accessed February 27, 2021. http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/view.asp?ccid=1478&lang=en
-
- Wojtyra U. Canada: update on biosimilars in Canada – August 2020. August 27, 2020. Accessed February 27, 2021. https://www.mondaq.com/canada/healthcare/980240/update-on-biosimilars-in...
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources