Mismatch in Supply and Demand for Neuro-Ophthalmic Care
- PMID: 33770009
- DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001214
Mismatch in Supply and Demand for Neuro-Ophthalmic Care
Abstract
Background: Previous research suggests the number of neuro-ophthalmologists in the United States may be below a level that provides sufficient access to neuro-ophthalmic care in much of the United States. However, national estimates of the amount of clinical time spent on neuro-ophthalmology are lacking.
Methods: The North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society administered a survey on professional time allocation to its active members. Survey response was 95%. The survey characterized the hours each week each respondent allocated to overall work, clinical work, clinical work in ophthalmology/neurology, and clinical work in neuro-ophthalmology specifically. The survey additionally collected information regarding demographics, current wait times to be seen for new patients, and the difference in clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology spent between the current day compared with that shortly after completing clinical training. Linear regression was used to identify potential relationships between the above and average wait time.
Results: On average, responding physicians spent 70% of their clinical time on neuro-ophthalmology. In 6 states, there were no reported practicing neuro-ophthalmologists, and in only 8 states was the clinical full-time equivalent to population ratio below the suggested threshold of 1 for every 1.2 million. The median wait time for a new patient was 6 weeks. This wait time was associated with the fraction of clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology (0.2 weeks longer wait for a 10 percentage point increase in the fraction of time spent in neuro-ophthalmology; P = 0.02), and suggestively associated with training (training in ophthalmology was associated with 1.0 week shorter wait time; P = 0.06).
Conclusion: The survey suggests that neuro-ophthalmologists are unable to see patients in a timely manner and a decreasing number of clinicians are entering the field. Future interventions should be considered to incentivize neuro-ophthalmology training in ophthalmology and neurology residents such that the United States population is able to appropriately access neuro-ophthalmic care.
Copyright © 2021 by North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Frohman LP. The human resource crisis in neuro-ophthalmology. J Neuroophthalmol. 2008;28:231.
-
- Frohman L, Digre K. Elimination of consult codes in neuro-ophthalmology: another blow to our subspecialty? J Neuroophthalmol. 2010;30:210.
-
- Frohman LP. How can we assure that neuro-ophthalmology will survive? Ophthalmology 2005;112:741–743.
-
- Stunkel L, Mackay D, Bruce B, Newman N, Biousse V. Referral patterns in neuro-ophthalmology. J Neuroophthalmol. 2020;40:485–493.
-
- Stunkel L, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Diagnostic error and neuro-ophthalmology. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32:62–67.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
