Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May:144:110420.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110420. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

Quarantine for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan city: Support, understanding, compliance and psychological impact among lay public

Affiliations

Quarantine for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan city: Support, understanding, compliance and psychological impact among lay public

Yulan Lin et al. J Psychosom Res. 2021 May.

Abstract

Objective: Wuhan, the epicentre of the coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) outbreak, has been locked down on January 23, 2020. We conducted a study among the lay public in Wuhan to access their support, understanding of, compliance with, and the psychological impacts of the quarantine.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, online-based survey study between January 28, 2020, and February 2, 2020 among the adult lay public in Wuhan to access their support, understanding of, compliance with, and the psychological impacts of the quarantine. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to identify factors associated with psychological impacts.

Results: Among the 4100 participants investigated, a total of 15.9% were compliant with all the five household prevention measures, whereas 74.4% were compliant with all the three community prevention measures investigated. By demographics, participants of younger age, higher income, residing in an urban area, knowing neighbors infected with COVID-19 reported significantly higher psychological impact score. Participants with a lower level of support for quarantine were more likely to have a higher psychological impact score (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.07-1.96). Participants with a lower level of compliance with preventive measures (score of 0-19) reported higher psychological impact (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.22-1.60 vs. score 20-24). Participants who had been out of house socializing and attended public events expressed higher psychological impact.

Conclusions: Support, understanding of the rationale for quarantine are essential in ensuring appropriate psychological well-being during the quarantine. Improvements in compliance with preventive measures are highly warranted and may bring about a reduction in psychological distress.

Keywords: COVID-19; Psychosocial impact; Quarantine; Support compliance; Wuhan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The duration of the data collection period and the trend of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Wuhan and mainland China.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of responses for support and understanding of provincial quarantine and self-imposed quarantine (N = 4100).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lu H., Stratton C.W., Tang Y.W. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92(4):401–402. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25678. 31950516 PMC7166628. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hui D.S., Madani T.A., Ntoumi F., Kock R., Dar O., et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. International journal of infectious diseases. IJID. 2020;91:264–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . (COVID-19) Situation Report. 2019. Coronavirus disease.https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/2... Available online. (Accessed on 16 March 2020)
    1. Rothstein M.A., Coughlin C.N. Ensuring compliance with quarantine by undocumented immigrants and other vulnerable groups: public health versus politics. Am. J. Public Health. 2019;109(9):1179–1183. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305201. 31318598 PMC6687239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maunder R., Hunter J., Vincent L., Bennett J., Peladeau N., Leszcz M., et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003;168(10):1245–1251. (PubMed PMID: 12743065; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC154178) - PMC - PubMed