Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;83(5):2267-2280.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02254-9. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Perceptual timing precision with vibrotactile, auditory, and multisensory stimuli

Affiliations

Perceptual timing precision with vibrotactile, auditory, and multisensory stimuli

Mercedes B Villalonga et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

The growing use of vibrotactile signaling devices makes it important to understand the perceptual limits on vibrotactile information processing. To promote that understanding, we carried out a pair of experiments on vibrotactile, auditory, and bimodal (synchronous vibrotactile and auditory) temporal acuity. On each trial, subjects experienced a set of isochronous, standard intervals (400 ms each), followed by one interval of variable duration (400 ± 1-80 ms). Intervals were demarcated by short vibrotactile, auditory, or bimodal pulses. Subjects categorized the timing of the last interval by describing the final pulse as either "early" or "late" relative to its predecessors. In Experiment 1, each trial contained three isochronous standard intervals, followed by an interval of variable length. In Experiment 2, the number of isochronous standard intervals per trial varied, from one to four. Psychometric modeling revealed that vibrotactile stimulation produced poorer temporal discrimination than either auditory or bimodal stimulation. Moreover, auditory signals dominated bimodal sensitivity, and inter-individual differences in temporal discriminability were reduced with bimodal stimulation. Additionally, varying the number of isochronous intervals in a trial failed to improve temporal sensitivity in either modality, suggesting that memory played a key role in judgments of interval duration.

Keywords: Auditory perception; Individual differences; Memory; Multisensory perception; Temporal sensitivity; Timing; Vibrotactile perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agam, Y., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Interactions between working memory and visual perception: An ERP/EEG study. NeuroImage, 36(3), 933–942. - PubMed
    1. Azari, L., Mioni, G., Rousseau, R., & Grondin, S. (2020). An analysis of the processing of intramodal and intermodal time intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 1473–1487.
    1. Bausenhart, K.M., Di Luca, M., & Ulrich, R. (2018). Assessing duration discrimination: Psychophysical methods and psychometric function analysis. In Timing and Time Perception: Procedures, Measures, & Applications (52–78). Brill.
    1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Burr, D., Banks, M.S., & Morrone, M.C. (2009). Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Experimental Brain Research, 198, 49–57. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources