The state of TURP through a historical lens
- PMID: 33772604
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03607-7
The state of TURP through a historical lens
Abstract
In 1926 Maximilian Stern introduced a new instrument to treat obstructions at the vesical orifice and baptized it resectoscope. With reference to astonishing historical statements about the new instrument and surgical technique made by the pioneers and their critics we will value why transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for most men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement. TURP is currently challenged by recently introduced new instruments and techniques claiming advantages over TURP. However, TURP offers an excellent balance between high efficacy in symptom relieve and low morbidity along with low costs and favorable long term outcome compared to other treatment options. We will outline these arguments demonstrating that even after a century has elapsed, since its introduction into the urologists armamentarium, TURP continues to stand the passage of time.
Keywords: LUTS; Prostatic hyperplasia; Transurethral resection of prostate.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Stern M (1926) Resection of obstructions at the vesical orifice. JAMA 87(14):1726–1730 - DOI
-
- Davis TM (1931) Prostate operation. Prospects of the patient with prostatic disease in prostatectomy vs resection. JAMA 97(19):1674–1679 - DOI
-
- McCarthy A (1931) A new apparatus for endoscopic plastic surgery of the prostate, diathermia and excision of vesical growths. J Urol 26(5):695–696 - DOI
-
- EAU Guidelines (2020) Edn presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3. https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-mal-luts . Accessed 14 Sept 2020