Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 1:46:bjab012.
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab012.

SCENTinel 1.0: Development of a Rapid Test to Screen for Smell Loss

Affiliations

SCENTinel 1.0: Development of a Rapid Test to Screen for Smell Loss

Valentina Parma et al. Chem Senses. .

Abstract

Commercially available smell tests are primarily used in research or in-depth clinical evaluations and are too costly and time-consuming for population surveillance in health emergencies like COVID-19. To address this need, we developed the SCENTinel 1.0 test, which rapidly evaluates 3 olfactory functions: detection, intensity, and identification. We tested whether self-administering the SCENTinel 1.0 test discriminates between individuals with self-reported smell loss and those with average smell ability (normosmic individuals) and provides performance comparable to the validated and standardized NIH Toolbox Odor Identification Test in normosmic individuals. Using Bayesian linear models and prognostic classification algorithms, we compared the SCENTinel 1.0 performance of a group of self-reported anosmic individuals (N = 111, 47 ± 13 years old, F = 71%) and normosmic individuals (N = 154, 47 ± 14 years old, F = 74%) as well as individuals reporting other smell disorders (such as hyposmia or parosmia; N = 42, 55 ± 10 years old, F = 67%). Ninety-four percent of normosmic individuals met our SCENTinel 1.0 accuracy criteria compared with only 10% of anosmic individuals and 64% of individuals with other smell disorders. Overall performance on SCENTinel 1.0 predicted belonging to the normosmic group better than identification or detection alone (vs. anosmic: AUC = 0.95, specificity = 0.94). Odor intensity provided the best single-feature predictor to classify normosmic individuals. Among normosmic individuals, 92% met the accuracy criteria at both SCENTinel 1.0 and the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification Test. SCENTinel 1.0 is a practical test able to discriminate individuals with smell loss and will likely be useful in many clinical situations, including COVID-19 symptom screening.

Keywords: anosmia; hyposmia; prediction; smell loss; smell test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sample description by group. Other: participants who self-reported other smell disorders. NIH: Normosmic individuals who completed the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification Test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
SCENTinel 1.0 response patterns by smell group (anosmic individuals = red; other smell disorders = blue; normosmic individuals = green). Response patterns 1, 3, 5, and 7 met the SCENTinel accuracy criteria.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and statistics on SCENTinel 1.0 scores overall and for single subtests across groups: (A) anosmic individuals versus normosmic individuals; (B) other smell disorders versus normosmic individuals; (C) anosmic individuals versus other smell disorders) based on the linear discriminant analysis algorithm. AUC, area under the curve; P, P value; D, DeLong’s test for 2 ROC curves; df, degrees of freedom.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Concordance between SCENTinel 1.0 and the NIH Toolbox Odor Identification Test in normosmic individuals: (A) concordance based on flower odor identification performance; (B) concordance based on full completion of both smell tests.

Update of

References

    1. Ayabe-Kanamura S, Schicker I, Laska M, Hudson R, Distel H, Kobayakawa T, Saito S. 1998. Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study. Chem Senses. 23(1):31–38. - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharjee AS, Joshi SV, Naik S, Sangle S, Abraham NM. 2020. Quantitative assessment of olfactory dysfunction accurately detects asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers. EClinicalMedicine. 28:100575. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boesveldt S, Postma EM, Boak D, Welge-Luessen A, Schöpf V, Mainland JD, Martens J, Ngai J, Duffy VB. 2017. Anosmia - a clinical review. Chem Senses. 42(7):513–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brann DH, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C, Lipovsek M, den Berge KV, Gong B, Chance R, Macaulay IC, Chou H-J, Fletcher RB, et al. 2020. Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia. Sci Adv. 6:eabc5801. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cavazzana A, Larsson M, Münch M, Hähner A, Hummel T. 2018. Postinfectious olfactory loss: a retrospective study on 791 patients. Laryngoscope. 128(1):10–15. - PubMed

Publication types