Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;361(5):575-584.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Policy Interventions, Social Distancing, and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the United States: A Retrospective State-level Analysis

Nickolas Dreher  1 , Zachary Spiera  2 , Fiona M McAuley  2 , Lindsey Kuohn  2 , John R Durbin  2 , Naoum Fares Marayati  2 , Muhammad Ali  2 , Adam Y Li  2 , Theodore C Hannah  2 , Alex Gometz  3 , J T Kostman  4 , Tanvir F Choudhri  2
Affiliations

Policy Interventions, Social Distancing, and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the United States: A Retrospective State-level Analysis

Nickolas Dreher et al. Am J Med Sci. 2021 May.

Abstract

Background: Various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as stay-at-home orders and school closures have been employed to limit the spread of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This study measures the impact of social distancing policies on COVID-19 transmission in US states during the early outbreak phase to assess which policies were most effective.

Methods: To measure transmissibility, we analyze the average effective reproductive number (Rt) in each state the week following its 500th case and doubling time from 500 to 1000 cases. Linear and logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of various NPIs while controlling for population density, GDP, and certain health metrics. This analysis was repeated for deaths with doubling time to 100 deaths with several healthcare infrastructure control variables.

Results: States with stay-at-home orders in place at the time of their 500th case were associated with lower average Rt the following week compared to states without them (p<0.001) and significantly less likely to have an Rt>1 (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.37, p = 0.004). These states also experienced longer doubling time from 500 to 1000 cases (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004). States in the highest quartile of average time spent at home were also slower to reach 1000 cases than those in the lowest quartile (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.53, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Stay-at-home orders had the largest effect of any policy analyzed. Multivariate analyses with cellphone tracking data suggest social distancing adherence drives these effects. States that plan to scale back such measures should carefully monitor transmission metrics.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Limitations on mass gatherings; Non-essential business closure; Non-pharmaceutical interventions; Novel coronavirus; Public policy; SARS-CoV-2; School closure; Social distancing; Stay-at-home order.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig 1
figure 1
Average Rt during the week following the 500th case by each U.S. state.
Fig 2
figure 2
Hazards curve demonstrating the probability of reaching 1000 cases separated by (A) states with and without a stay-at-home order prior to the 500th case, (B) the highest vs. lowest quartile of percent time spent at home based on Google mobility data for all states, and (C) the highest vs. lowest quartile of percent time spent at home amongst states that had a stay-at-home order prior to the 500th case.
Fig 3
figure 3
Hazard curve showing the probability of reaching 100 deaths separated by states with and without a stay-at-home (SAH) order prior to the 50th death.
Fig 4
figure 4
Time spent in residential areas before and after stay-at-home order.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Li Q., Guan X., Wu P. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199–1207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banholzer N., van Weenen E., Kratzwald B. Estimating the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on documented infections with COVID-19: a cross-country analysis. medRxiv. 2020
    1. Lasry A., Kidder D., Hast M. Vol. 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. (. Timing of Community Mitigation and Changes in Reported COVID-19 and Community Mobility―Four US Metropolitan areas, February 26–April 1, 2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. 2020. Institute For Health Metrics and Evaluation. COVID-19 Resources. April 30 [cited 2020 April 30]; Available at: http://www.healthdata.org/covid. Accessed March 22, 2021.
    1. Johns Hopkins Univeristy & Medicine . 2020. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) At Johns Hopkins University (JHU) April 30 [cited 2020 April 30]; Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed March 22, 2021.