Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 May;207(5):555-68.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198805000-00010.

The atriocaval shunt. Facts and fiction

Affiliations

The atriocaval shunt. Facts and fiction

J M Burch et al. Ann Surg. 1988 May.

Abstract

During the past 11 years, 31 patients with major juxtahepatic venous injuries were treated with the atriocaval shunt. Penetrating injuries occurred in 27 patients (87%), and injuries from blunt trauma occurred in four patients. Shock was present on admission in 28 patients (90%). Resuscitative thoracotomy for cardiovascular collapse was required in 13 patients (42%). Juxtahepatic venous injuries included the vena cava in 23 patients (74%) and the hepatic veins alone in five patients (16%). One patient had an isolated portal venous injury, and two patients died before their vascular injuries could be delineated. Technical problems related to the shunt occurred in seven patients. Most were related to delays in placement or problems encountered in obtaining vascular control of the suprarenal vena cava. Major hepatic resection was performed in 11 patients (35%). Twenty-five patients died of their injuries. No patient survived who required resuscitative thoracotomy, hepatic resection, or when technical problems with the shunt occurred. Six patients (19%) survived and were discharged from the hospital. All sustained gunshot wounds to the retro-hepatic vena cava. Four of the six survivors had serious postoperative complications, but none were related to the shunt. Major juxtahepatic venous injuries are highly lethal. The atriocaval shunt will permit the salvage of some patients where other methods are not possible. Avoidance of delay and alternative shunting techniques that eliminate difficult maneuvers may improve survival in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1971 Jun;102(6):566-73 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1970 Oct;50(5):999-1002 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1971 Sep;11(9):736-7 - PubMed
    1. J Trauma. 1971 Sep;11(9):738-41 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1972 Jan;104(1):104-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms