Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 12:12:626393.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626393. eCollection 2021.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Cavitation as a Mechanism of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Current Debates, Methods, and Findings

Affiliations
Review

Cerebrospinal Fluid Cavitation as a Mechanism of Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of Current Debates, Methods, and Findings

Jenny L Marsh et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Cavitation has gained popularity in recent years as a potential mechanism of blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI). This review presents the most prominent debates on cavitation; how bubbles can form or exist within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and brain vasculature, potential mechanisms of cellular, and tissue level damage following the collapse of bubbles in response to local pressure fluctuations, and a survey of experimental and computational models used to address cavitation research questions. Due to the broad and varied nature of cavitation research, this review attempts to provide a necessary synthesis of cavitation findings relevant to bTBI, and identifies key areas where additional work is required. Fundamental questions about the viability and likelihood of CSF cavitation during blast remain, despite a variety of research regarding potential injury pathways. Much of the existing literature on bTBI evaluates cavitation based off its prima facie plausibility, while more rigorous evaluation of its likelihood becomes increasingly necessary. This review assesses the validity of some of the common assumptions in cavitation research, as well as highlighting outstanding questions that are essential in future work.

Keywords: BTBI; blastinjury; cavitation; cerebrospinal fluid; injury-head trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outstanding questions and debates in cavitation research described in this review. The largest bubble represents the central question of cavitation in bTBI research. Underlying questions and their theoretical solutions are labeled in the second largest bubble clusters, with logistical questions and possible approaches shown in the smallest clusters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Planar Friedlander waveform adapted from Chandra et al. (37). In the figure, the instantaneous overpressure p+ at time t is defined using the peak overpressure p*, positive phase duration td, and decay constant b.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weppner J, Linsenmeyer M, Ide W. Military blast-related traumatic brain injury. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. (2019) 7:323–32. 10.1007/s40141-019-00241-8 - DOI
    1. McCarty AK, Zhang L, Hansen S, Jackson WJ, Bentil SA. Viscoelastic properties of shock wave exposed brain tissue subjected to unconfined compression experiments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. (2019) 100:103380. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103380 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nakagawa A, Manley GT, Gean AD, Ohtani K, Armonda R, Tsukamoto A, et al. . Mechanisms of primary blast-induced traumatic brain injury: insights from shock wave research. J Neurotrauma. (2011) 28:1101–19. 10.1089/neu.2010.1442 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Jackson WJ, Bentil SA. The mechanical behavior of brain surrogates manufactured from silicone elastomers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. (2019) 95:180–90. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DoD Worldwide Numbers for TBI . DVBIC. (2020).