Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads
- PMID: 33777288
- PMCID: PMC7993908
- DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2021.143009
Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.
Background: Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.
Results: The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.
Conclusions: With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.
Keywords: Abandoned leads; Extra-cardiac devices; Implantable loop recorder; MRI Safety; Pacemaker.
Figures

References
-
- Damadian R, Goldsmith M, Minkoff L. (1977) NMR in cancer: XVI. FONAR image of the live human body. Physiol Chem Phys, 9(1):97–100, 8. - PubMed
-
- Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 38: Preventing accidents and injuries in the MRI suite, (2008). - PubMed
-
- Expert Panel on MRS, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr., et al. (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging, 37(3):501–30. - PubMed
-
- Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, McRee R, Kaufman L, Margulis AR. (1981) Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 137(4):857–60. - PubMed
-
- Zheutlin JD, Thompson JT, Shofner RS. (1987) The safety of magnetic resonance imaging with intraorbital metallic objects after retinal reattachment or trauma. Am J Ophthalmol, 103(6):831. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous