Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;14(3):83-93.
doi: 10.4236/jbise.2021.143009. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads

Affiliations

Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads

Prabhakaran P Gopalakrishnan et al. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.

Background: Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.

Results: The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.

Conclusions: With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.

Keywords: Abandoned leads; Extra-cardiac devices; Implantable loop recorder; MRI Safety; Pacemaker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure. 1.
Figure. 1.. Non-pacemaker / defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads in MRI environment.
Yellow arrows: Device/lead; White arrows: Pathology identified. A. MRI of left knee in a patient with implantable loop recorder, showing mild tricompartmental chondrosis. B. Cardiac MRI in a nonischemic cardiomyopathy patient with a Watchman device, showing delayed hyperenhancement in inferoseptal segment. C. Cardiac MRI in a heart transplant patient with retained leads, presenting with chronic rejection. D. MRI brain in a patient with coiled abandoned leads, showing a hypoenhancing lesion in pituitary gland and pituitary compression. E. MRI lumbar spine in a patient with spinal cord stimulator, showing disc herniation with spinal canal and foraminal stenosis. F. MRI Brain in a patient with vagal nerve stimulator, showing cystic lesion in sella turcica with suprasellar extension.

References

    1. Damadian R, Goldsmith M, Minkoff L. (1977) NMR in cancer: XVI. FONAR image of the live human body. Physiol Chem Phys, 9(1):97–100, 8. - PubMed
    1. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 38: Preventing accidents and injuries in the MRI suite, (2008). - PubMed
    1. Expert Panel on MRS, Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr., et al. (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging, 37(3):501–30. - PubMed
    1. Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, McRee R, Kaufman L, Margulis AR. (1981) Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 137(4):857–60. - PubMed
    1. Zheutlin JD, Thompson JT, Shofner RS. (1987) The safety of magnetic resonance imaging with intraorbital metallic objects after retinal reattachment or trauma. Am J Ophthalmol, 103(6):831. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources