Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Feb;21(1):e103-e109.
doi: 10.18295/squmj.2021.21.01.014. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman

Affiliations
Review

Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman

Philomena C D'Souza et al. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: Totally implantable central venous access ports (port-a-caths) are increasingly used for the safe administration of chemotherapy; however, their use is associated with complications. This study reviews patterns of complications, reasons for premature removal and the duration of the use of port-a-caths in patients receiving cancer treatment at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) and compares the infection rate with the literature and the researchers' experiences.

Methods: This retrospective follow-up study included patients who had received cancer treatment through a port-a-cath and were admitted to SQUH between January 2007 and April 2019. Demographic features, underlying diagnosis, clinical stage, treatment, duration of use and the cause of premature removal of the port-a-cath were recorded.

Results: A total of 516 port-a-caths were inserted in 482 cancer patients. The majority of devices were implanted by interventional radiologists (n = 459; 89.0%) and the right internal jugular vein was most frequently accessed (n = 396; 76.7%). The mean indwelling time of a port-a-cath was 288 days (range: 3-1,872 days) for patients with complications and 550 days (range: 7-3,123 days) for patients without complications. Port-a-cath-related infection was the main complication (n = 63; 12.2%). Patient age, gender, treatment intent, underlying diagnosis, clinical stage, chemotherapy regimen, number of treatment courses, operator implanting the port, the type of micro-organism isolated from the port-a-cath and body mass index were significant factors affecting catheter indwelling time (P <0.05). On multivariate analysis, however, none of the factors was found to be significant.

Conclusion: Infection was the most common complication necessitating port-a-cath removal. The infection rate was much lower than the researchers' previous experience and compares favorably with several published reports.

Keywords: Cancer; Catheter-Related Infections; Oman; Port-A-Cath; Vascular Access Ports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of outcomes of patients’ with solid tumours who underwent port-a-cath implantation at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman from January 2007 to April 2019.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Duration of port-a-cath use in patients with solid tumours at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman from January 2007 to April 2019.

References

    1. Tabatabaie O, Kasumova GG, Eskander MF, Critchlow JF, Tawa NE, Tseng JF. Totally implantable venous access devices: A review of complications and management strategies. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40:94–105. doi: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000361. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toure A, Vanhems P, Lombard-Bohas C, Cassier P, Pere-Verge D, Souquet JC, et al. Totally implantable central venous access port infections in patients with digestive cancer: Incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:935–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teichgraber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN, Gebauer B. Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1224–32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2045-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Souza PC, Kumar S, Kakaria A, Al-Sukaiti R, Zahid KF, Furrukh M, et al. Use of port-a-cath in cancer patients: A single-center experience. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8:1476–82. doi: 10.3855/jidc.4155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yildizeli B, Lacin T, Batirel HF, Yuksel M. Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports. J Vasc Access. 2004;5:174–8. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances