Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 12:9:658498.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.658498. eCollection 2021.

Induced Neurons for Disease Modeling and Repair: A Focus on Non-fibroblastic Cell Sources in Direct Reprogramming

Affiliations
Review

Induced Neurons for Disease Modeling and Repair: A Focus on Non-fibroblastic Cell Sources in Direct Reprogramming

Kathryn M Kim et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Direct cellular reprogramming exhibits distinct advantages over reprogramming from an induced pluripotent stem cell intermediate. These include a reduced risk of tumorigenesis and the likely preservation of epigenetic data. In vitro direct reprogramming approaches primarily aim to model the pathophysiological development of neurological disease and identify therapeutic targets, while in vivo direct reprogramming aims to develop treatments for various neurological disorders, including cerebral injury and cancer. In both approaches, there is progress toward developing increased control of subtype-specific production of induced neurons. A majority of research primarily utilizes fibroblasts as the donor cells. However, there are a variety of other somatic cell types that have demonstrated the potential for reprogramming into induced neurons. This review highlights studies that utilize non-fibroblastic cell sources for reprogramming, such as astrocytes, olfactory ensheathing cells, peripheral blood cells, Müller glia, and more. We will examine benefits and obstructions for translation into therapeutics or disease modeling, as well as efficiency of the conversion. A summary of donor cells, induced neuron types, and methods of induction is also provided.

Keywords: brain repair; direct reprogramming; glia; induced neurons; neurogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahlfors J.-E., Azimi A., El-Ayoubi R., Velumian A., Vonderwalde I., Boscher C., et al. (2019). Examining the fundamental biology of a novel population of directly reprogrammed human neural precursor cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10:166. 10.1186/s13287-019-1255-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aravantinou-Fatorou K., Thomaidou D. (2020). “In vitro direct reprogramming of mouse and human astrocytes to induced neurons,” in Stem Cells and Tissue Repair: Methods and Protocols, ed. Kioussi C. (New York, NY: Springer; ), 41–61. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0655-1_4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brulet R., Matsuda T., Zhang L., Miranda C., Giacca M., Kaspar B. K., et al. (2017). NEUROD1 instructs neuronal conversion in non-reactive astrocytes. Stem Cell Rep. 8 1506–1515. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castaño J., Menendez P., Bruzos-Cidon C., Straccia M., Sousa A., Zabaleta L., et al. (2014). Fast and efficient neural conversion of human hematopoietic cells. Stem Cell Rep. 3 1118–1131. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cates K., McCoy M. J., Kwon J. S., Liu Y., Abernathy D. G., Zhang B., et al. (2021). Deconstructing stepwise fate conversion of human fibroblasts to neurons by microRNAs. Cell Stem Cell 28 127–140.e9. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.08.015 Epub 2020 Sep 21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources