It's complicated: The impact of marriage legalization among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals in the United States
- PMID: 33778093
- PMCID: PMC7992926
- DOI: 10.1037/sgd0000375
It's complicated: The impact of marriage legalization among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals in the United States
Abstract
This mixed-methods study explored perceptions of the impact of marriage legalization in all U.S. states among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals. Survey data were collected from a nonprobability sample of individuals 18 years or older who identified as lesbian, bisexual, queer, same-sex attracted or something other than exclusively heterosexual-as well as individuals who identified as transgender or gender nonbinary (for example, genderqueer, trans woman, trans man, nonbinary, or gender non-conforming). The analytic sample included 418 participants in an online survey who responded to open-ended questions about the perceived impact of marriage legalization. Qualitative analyses revealed perceptions of marriage legalization that situated individual meanings in the context of broader political and social factors. Four themes represented the complex perceptions of participants about marriage legalization: 1) establishing a victory in civil rights, social inclusion, and acceptance; 2) creating a paradox between positives of legalization and limitations of marriage as an institution; 3) amplifying concerns for unaddressed safety and rights issues; and 4) contributing to the erosion of queer identity and community. Quantitative analyses revealed several differences by demographic characteristics, such as greater concern about the erosion of community among unmarried participants compared to participants who were married. Findings underscore the importance of policies that advance equality for sexual and gender minorities (SGMs), as well as the importance of research exploring how policies are perceived by and impact SGM subpopulations.
Keywords: gender nonbinary; marriage legalization; sexual minority women; transgender.
Similar articles
-
Perceived psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage: A scoping review of sexual minority adults' experiences.PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0249125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249125. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33956825 Free PMC article.
-
Examining perceived effects of same-sex marriage legalization among sexual minority women: Identifying demographic differences and factors related to alcohol use disorder, depression, and self-perceived health.Sex Res Social Policy. 2022 Sep;19(3):1285-1299. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00639-x. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Sex Res Social Policy. 2022. PMID: 36407656 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of Marriage Legalization on the Experiences of Sexual Minority Women in Work and Community Contexts.J GLBT Fam Stud. 2019;15(3):211-234. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2018.1474829. Epub 2018 Jun 20. J GLBT Fam Stud. 2019. PMID: 31080374 Free PMC article.
-
The Interaction of Same-Sex Marriage Access With Sexual Minority Identity on Mental Health and Subjective Wellbeing.J Homosex. 2017;64(5):638-653. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1196991. Epub 2016 Jun 7. J Homosex. 2017. PMID: 27269121
-
Experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender within mainstream community: a systematic review of qualitative studies.JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jan;19(1):59-154. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00032. JBI Evid Synth. 2021. PMID: 33074982
Cited by
-
Associations Between Latent Classes of Trauma Exposure and Minority Stressors and Substance Use Among Cisgender Sexual Minority Women.J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8286-8315. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153886. Epub 2023 Feb 26. J Interpers Violence. 2023. PMID: 36843440 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women.J GLBT Fam Stud. 2021;17(4):371-392. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382. Epub 2021 Jun 7. J GLBT Fam Stud. 2021. PMID: 34840535 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage: A scoping review of sexual minority adults' experiences.PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0249125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249125. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33956825 Free PMC article.
-
Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474. Demography. 2022. PMID: 36121115 Free PMC article.
-
Examining perceived effects of same-sex marriage legalization among sexual minority women: Identifying demographic differences and factors related to alcohol use disorder, depression, and self-perceived health.Sex Res Social Policy. 2022 Sep;19(3):1285-1299. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00639-x. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Sex Res Social Policy. 2022. PMID: 36407656 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abou-Chadi T, & Finnigan R (2018). Rights for same-sex couples and public attitudes toward gays and lesbians in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 52(6), 868–895. doi:10.1177/0010414018797947 - DOI
-
- Aviram H (2008). Make love, not law: Perceptions of the marriage equality struggle among polyamorous activists. Journal of Bisexuality, 7(3-4), 261–286. doi:10.1080/15299710802171332 - DOI
-
- Badgett M (2011). Social inclusion and the value of marriage equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 316–334. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01700.x - DOI
-
- Bernstein M, Harvey B, & Naples NA (2018). Marriage, the final frontier? Same-sex marriage and the future of the lesbian and gay movement. Sociological Forum, 33(1), 30–52. doi:10.1111/socf.12392 - DOI
-
- Bishin BG, Hayes TJ, Incantalupo MB, & Smith CA (2016). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: Are political advances in gay rights counterproductive? American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 625–648. doi:10.1111/ajps.12181 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources