Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 13;3(3):236-247.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.006. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Review of Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation Therapy for Cardiac Tachydysrhythmias

Affiliations
Review

Review of Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation Therapy for Cardiac Tachydysrhythmias

Michael H Chiu et al. CJC Open. .

Abstract

Cardiac tachyarrhythmias are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Treatments for these tachyarrhythmias include antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, surgical ablation, cardiac implantable electronic devices, and cardiac transplantation. Each of these treatment approaches is effective in some patients but there is considerable room for improvement, particularly with respect to the most common of the tachydysrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, and the most dangerous of the tachydysrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation. Noninvasive stereotactic ablative radiation therapy is emerging as an effective treatment for refractory tachyarrhythmias. Animal models have shown successful ablation of arrhythmogenic myocardial substrates with minimal short-term complications. Studies of stereotactic radioablation involving patients with refractory VT have shown a reduction in VT recurrence and promising early safety data. In this review, we provide the background for the application of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation therapy along with promising results from early applications of the technology.

Les tachyarythmies cardiaques sont une cause importante de morbidité et de mortalité. Les traitements employés comprennent des antiarythmiques, l’ablation par cathéter, l’ablation par chirurgie, l’implantation de dispositifs cardiaques électroniques et la transplantation cardiaque. Toutes ces démarches thérapeutiques sont efficaces dans certains cas, mais les traitements peuvent encore être largement améliorés, en particulier en ce qui concerne la fibrillation auriculaire, qui est la tachyarythmie la plus fréquente, et la tachycardie ventriculaire (TV, aussi appelée fibrillation ventriculaire), qui est la tachyarythmie la plus dangereuse. La radiochirurgie stéréotaxique non invasive se démarque de plus en plus comme traitement efficace des tachyarythmies réfractaires. Des substrats myocardiques arythmogènes ont pu être réséqués avec succès sur des modèles animaux, l’intervention n’ayant entraîné que des complications minimales de courte durée. Dans le cadre d’études menées auprès de patients présentant une TV réfractaire, la radiochirurgie stéréotaxique a permis de réduire le risque de récurrence de la TV, et les premières données sur l’innocuité du traitement sont encourageantes. Dans notre revue, nous précisons le cadre d’application de la radiochirurgie stéréotaxique visant à réséquer le tissu responsable de l’arythmie, et nous présentons les résultats prometteurs des premières applications de la technologie à cette fin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery. The red contour on the computed tomography image represents the target volume. The colour wash represents the radiation dose delivered to the target volume. The radiation dose is delivered simultaneously by varying 3 parameters during treatment delivery: gantry rotation speed, treatment aperture shape via movement of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaves (shown in each square), and dose rate. Each square represents the specific MLC pattern to deliver a fraction of the dose at that specific gantry angle. Image courtesy of Varian Medical Systems, Inc. All rights reserved
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outcomes after left ventricular free wall irradiation. (A) Transverse and coronal plane of a treatment plan with 2 lateral carbon beams (40 Gy). (B) Anteroposterior view of by-product β+ activity shown as colour wash. (C) Intracardiac ultrasound image of the left ventricular free wall (F) after irradiation; hyperechoic lesion area marked by dotted lines. (D) Left anterior oblique view of an endocardial voltage map of the left ventricle (LV) 6 months after irradiation; local voltage > 1.0 mV is depicted in magenta, voltage < 0.5 mV depicted in red, and other colours mark voltages in between. White dots indicate fragmented potentials. (E) Macroscopic left ventricular epicardial lesion outcome 6 months after irradiation with the dashed line marking the contoured target zone. (F) Endocardial lesion outcome 6 months after irradiation. Ao, descending aorta; F, Freewall; IPV, inferior pulmonary vein; IVC, inferior vena cava; IVS, interventricular septum; LAA, left atrial appendage; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LL, left lung; LV-A, left ventricular apex; MV, mitral valve; RL, right lung; RV, right ventricle; RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract; S, septal site. Modified from Lehmann et al. under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) treatment planning and protocol. Patients to consider for STAR followed by planning, delivery, and follow-up. CT, computed tomography; EP, electrophysiology; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LV, left ventricle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RV, right ventricle.

References

    1. Priori S.G., Blomström-Lundqvist C., Mazzanti A. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Europace. 2015;17:1601–1687. - PubMed
    1. Antzelevitch C., Burashnikov A. Overview of basic mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2011;3:23–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly S.J., Dorian P., Roberts R.S. Comparison of β-blockers, amiodarone plus β-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:165–171. - PubMed
    1. Kumar S., Androulakis A.F.A., Sellal J.M. Multicenter experience with catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in lamin A/C cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9 - PubMed
    1. Bhaskaran A., Chik W., Thomas S., Kovoor P., Thiagalingam A. A review of the safety aspects of radio frequency ablation. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015;8:147–153. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources