Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 27;1(1):e190005.
doi: 10.1148/rycan.2019190005. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis

Affiliations

Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis

Matthew Brown et al. Radiol Imaging Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: To apply previously published benefit-to-risk ratio methods for mammography and molecular breast imaging (MBI) risk estimates to an expanded range of mammographic screening techniques, compressed breast thicknesses, and screening views.

Materials and methods: Only previously published estimates were used; therefore, this study was exempt from the requirement to obtain institutional review board approval. Benefit-to-risk ratios were calculated as the ratio of breast cancer deaths averted and lives lost to screening over 10-year intervals starting at age 40 years for MBI, two-dimensional (2D) full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, 2D FFDM with synthetic mammography, and 2D FFDM with tomosynthesis for two-, four-, and five-view screening mammography and compressed breast thicknesses of 20-29 mm, 50-59 mm, and 80-89 mm.

Results: Central estimates of the benefit-to-risk ratios ranged from 3 to 179 for screening mammography and from 5 to 9 for MBI. Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI were inferior to those for mammography for most scenarios, but MBI may be performed at an equal or superior benefit-to-risk ratio for women aged 40-59 years with a compressed breast thickness of at least 80 mm and for those undergoing mammographic screening examinations with four or five views per breast. The benefit-to-risk ratios across all ages with use of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM as a screening examination were 45% lower than those for tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography.

Conclusion: Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI are within the lower range of those for mammography when accounting for variation in mammography technique, compressed breast thickness, and age. Benefit-to-risk ratios of synthetic mammography plus tomosynthesis are superior to those of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM.Keywords: Breast, Mammography, Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Radiation Safety, Radionuclide Studies, Screening, Tomosynthesis© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by Hruska in this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: M.B. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: is employed by Barnes-Jewish Healthcare; received travel/accommodations/meeting expenses from Northwest Radiology Network. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. M.F.C. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: is a paid consultant for Hologic; receives payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus from Hologic. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.

Figures

Figure:
Figure:
Chart shows estimated net deaths averted per 100 000 women screened. Data were calculated by subtracting the estimated lives lost from screening from the estimated deaths averted with screening. FFDM = full-field digital mammography, MBI = molecular breast imaging, synthetic = synthetic mammography, tomo = tomosynthesis, 2D = two-dimensional.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hruska CB. Molecular breast imaging for screening in dense breasts: state of the art and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208(2):275–283. - PubMed
    1. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(3,3 Pt A):408–414. - PubMed
    1. Holbrook A, Newel MS. Alternative screening for women with dense breasts: breast-specific gamma imaging (molecular breast imaging). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(2):252–256. - PubMed
    1. Hendrick RE, Tredennick T. Benefit to radiation risk of breast-specific gamma imaging compared with mammography in screening asymptomatic women with dense breasts. Radiology 2016;281(2):583–588. - PubMed
    1. Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology 2010;257(1):246–253. - PubMed