Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis
- PMID: 33778669
- PMCID: PMC7983792
- DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2019190005
Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis
Abstract
Purpose: To apply previously published benefit-to-risk ratio methods for mammography and molecular breast imaging (MBI) risk estimates to an expanded range of mammographic screening techniques, compressed breast thicknesses, and screening views.
Materials and methods: Only previously published estimates were used; therefore, this study was exempt from the requirement to obtain institutional review board approval. Benefit-to-risk ratios were calculated as the ratio of breast cancer deaths averted and lives lost to screening over 10-year intervals starting at age 40 years for MBI, two-dimensional (2D) full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, 2D FFDM with synthetic mammography, and 2D FFDM with tomosynthesis for two-, four-, and five-view screening mammography and compressed breast thicknesses of 20-29 mm, 50-59 mm, and 80-89 mm.
Results: Central estimates of the benefit-to-risk ratios ranged from 3 to 179 for screening mammography and from 5 to 9 for MBI. Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI were inferior to those for mammography for most scenarios, but MBI may be performed at an equal or superior benefit-to-risk ratio for women aged 40-59 years with a compressed breast thickness of at least 80 mm and for those undergoing mammographic screening examinations with four or five views per breast. The benefit-to-risk ratios across all ages with use of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM as a screening examination were 45% lower than those for tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography.
Conclusion: Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI are within the lower range of those for mammography when accounting for variation in mammography technique, compressed breast thickness, and age. Benefit-to-risk ratios of synthetic mammography plus tomosynthesis are superior to those of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM.Keywords: Breast, Mammography, Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Radiation Safety, Radionuclide Studies, Screening, Tomosynthesis© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by Hruska in this issue.
2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: M.B. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: is employed by Barnes-Jewish Healthcare; received travel/accommodations/meeting expenses from Northwest Radiology Network. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. M.F.C. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: is a paid consultant for Hologic; receives payment for lectures including service on speakers bureaus from Hologic. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.
Figures

Comment in
-
Let's Get Real about Molecular Breast Imaging and Radiation Risk.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019 Sep 27;1(1):e190070. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2019190070. eCollection 2019 Sep. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019. PMID: 33779637 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):37-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170745. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29237146
-
Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015 Apr;24(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Breast. 2015. PMID: 25554018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):655-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131391. Epub 2014 Jan 24. Radiology. 2014. PMID: 24484063 Clinical Trial.
-
Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):362-372. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16743. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28112559
-
Benefit of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to digital mammography for breast cancer screening focused on cancer characteristics: a meta-analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;164(3):557-569. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4298-1. Epub 2017 May 18. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 28516226 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.Curr Oncol. 2022 May 17;29(5):3595-3636. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050291. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35621681 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Toward the strengthening of radioprotection during mammography examinations through transparent glass screens: A benchmarking between experimental and Monte Carlo simulation studies.Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;11:1171209. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1171209. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37064659 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Radioprotective Indium (III) Oxide Screens for Mammography Scans Using a Three-Layer Heterogeneous Breast Phantom and MCNPX: A Comparative Study Using Clinical Findings.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 9;59(2):327. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020327. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 36837529 Free PMC article.
-
Advances and Future Directions in Molecular Breast Imaging.J Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;63(1):17-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.261988. Epub 2021 Dec 9. J Nucl Med. 2022. PMID: 34887334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening Algorithms in Dense Breasts: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Feb;216(2):275-294. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24436. Epub 2020 Dec 23. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021. PMID: 32903054 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hruska CB. Molecular breast imaging for screening in dense breasts: state of the art and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208(2):275–283. - PubMed
-
- Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(3,3 Pt A):408–414. - PubMed
-
- Holbrook A, Newel MS. Alternative screening for women with dense breasts: breast-specific gamma imaging (molecular breast imaging). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(2):252–256. - PubMed
-
- Hendrick RE, Tredennick T. Benefit to radiation risk of breast-specific gamma imaging compared with mammography in screening asymptomatic women with dense breasts. Radiology 2016;281(2):583–588. - PubMed
-
- Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology 2010;257(1):246–253. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical