Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Other Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Esophageal Cancer
- PMID: 33778756
- PMCID: PMC7983774
- DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2020200022
Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Other Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters for Prognosis Prediction in Esophageal Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity (IMH) and other quantitative fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT parameters for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, an automated gradient-based segmentation method was used to assess the maximum standardized uptake value, mean standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and IMH index of the primary tumor in patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with an initial staging 18F-FDG PET/CT. Data were collected between July 2006 and February 2016. OS and PFS were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with the adjustment (as covariates) of age, sex, weight, stage, tumor type, tumor grade, and treatment. All PET parameters were standardized before analysis. Log-rank tests were performed, and corresponding Kaplan-Meier survival plots were generated.
Results: A total of 71 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 10 [standard deviation], 62:9 men:women) were included. Median follow-up time was 28.2 months (range, 4-38 months), and median survival was 16.1 months (range, 0.1-60.3 months). Higher MTV was associated with reduced PFS for every standard deviation increase (hazard ratio [HR], 0.193; 95% CI: 0.052, 0.711; P = .01). Higher IMH was associated with reduced PFS for every standard deviation decrease in the area under the curve (HR, 10.78; 95% CI: 1.31, 88.96; P = .03).
Conclusion: PFS for patients with esophageal cancer was associated with MTV and with IMH.Keywords: Esophagus, Neoplasms-Primary, PET/CT, Tumor Response © RSNA, 2020.
2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: A.G. disclosed no relevant relationships. D.F.P. disclosed no relevant relationships. Y.X. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: employed by UT Southwestern Medical Center. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. R.S. disclosed no relevant relationships.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters in Predicting Prognosis for Patients With Cervical Cancer.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Apr;214(4):908-916. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21604. Epub 2020 Feb 18. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32069078
-
Texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Feb;44(2):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3506-2. Epub 2016 Sep 10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017. PMID: 27613542
-
Prognostic role of baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters in MALT lymphoma.Hematol Oncol. 2019 Feb;37(1):39-46. doi: 10.1002/hon.2563. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Hematol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30299563
-
Efficacy of cell proliferation imaging with 4DST PET/CT for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison study with FDG PET/CT.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jul;48(8):2615-2623. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05179-x. Epub 2021 Jan 12. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33438100
-
Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jul;46(7):1485-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04307-6. Epub 2019 Apr 4. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30949816
Cited by
-
Dual-tracer PET/CT protocol with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 outperforms single-tracer PET/CT with [18F]FDG in different cancer types, resulting in larger functional and gross tumor volume.Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jan;200(1):28-38. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02117-2. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024. PMID: 37584717 Free PMC article.
-
Mid-treatment changes in intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity correlate to outcomes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.EJNMMI Res. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13550-025-01226-6. EJNMMI Res. 2025. PMID: 40167887 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Heterogeneity Index in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 29;61(8):1370. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081370. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40870414 Free PMC article.
-
Can 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics Features Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma?Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;14(12):3035. doi: 10.3390/cancers14123035. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740700 Free PMC article.
-
Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT-Derived Parameters in Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Upper Third Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy.Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug;56(4):181-187. doi: 10.1007/s13139-022-00751-9. Epub 2022 May 10. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35846416 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Koshy M, Esiashvilli N, Landry JC, Thomas CR Jr, Matthews RH. Multiple management modalities in esophageal cancer: epidemiology, presentation and progression, work-up, and surgical approaches. Oncologist 2004;9(2):137–146. - PubMed
-
- Dong J, Thrift AP. Alcohol, smoking and risk of oesophago-gastric cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017;31(5):509–517. - PubMed
-
- Engel LS, Chow WH, Vaughan TL, et al. . Population attributable risks of esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(18):1404–1413. - PubMed
-
- Glenn TF. Esophageal cancer. Facts, figures, and screening. Gastroenterol Nurs 2001;24(6):271–273; quiz 274–275. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical