Similar articles

• Comparison of re-operation rates and complication rates after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH).

  Boosz A, Lermann J, Mehlhorn G, Loehberg C, Renner SP, Thiel FC, Schrauder M, Beckmann MW, Mueller A. Boosz A, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.021. Epub 2011 May 26. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21620553
• Invited Commentary: Toward Better Bias Analysis.

  Gustafson P. Gustafson P. Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1613-1616. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab068. Am J Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33778860
• Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic total or supracervical hysterectomy.

  Kafy S, Al-Sannan B, Kabli N, Tulandi T. Kafy S, et al. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67(3):169-72. doi: 10.1159/000184679. Epub 2008 Dec 17. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009. PMID: 19088480
• Complications in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy(LASH), especially the morcellation related.

  Krentel H, De Wilde RL. Krentel H, et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Aug;35:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 14. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 26694587 Review.
• Meta-analysis of Laparoendoscopic Single-site and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Multiport Hysterectomy: Real Benefits or Diminishing Returns?

  Michener CM, Lampert E, Yao M, Harnegie MP, Chalif J, Chambers LM. Michener CM, et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):698-709.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.029. Epub 2020 Dec 17. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33346073