Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?
- PMID: 33778976
- PMCID: PMC8360048
- DOI: 10.1002/pd.5940
Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?
Abstract
Since the completion of the Management of Myelomeningocoele Study, maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida has become a valid option for expecting parents. More recently, multiple groups are exploring a minimally invasive approach and recent outcomes have addressed many of the initial concerns with this approach. Based on a previously published framework, we attempt to delineate the developmental stage of the surgical techniques. Furthermore, we discuss the barriers of performing randomized controlled trials comparing two surgical interventions and suggest that data collection through registries is an alternative method to gather high-grade evidence.
© 2021 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interests to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Brock JW, Thomas JC, Baskin LS, et al. Effect of prenatal repair of myelomeningocele on urological outcomes at school age. J Urol. 2019;202(4):812‐818. - PubMed
-
- Bruner JP, Richards WO, Tulipan NB, Arney TL. Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomeningocele in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1 I):153‐158. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
