Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;68(4):316-326.
doi: 10.1111/zph.12827. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Zoonotic Bartonella species in Eurasian wolves and other free-ranging wild mammals from Italy

Affiliations

Zoonotic Bartonella species in Eurasian wolves and other free-ranging wild mammals from Italy

Grazia Greco et al. Zoonoses Public Health. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Bartonellae are emerging vector-borne pathogens infecting humans, domestic mammals and wildlife. Ninety-seven red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), 8 European badgers (Meles meles), 6 Eurasian wolves (Canis lupus), 6 European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), 3 beech martens (Martes foina) and 2 roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from Italian Nature Conservatory Parks were investigated for Bartonella infection. Several Bartonella species (9.84%; 95% CI: 4.55-15.12), including zoonotic ones, were molecularly detected among wolves (83.3%; 95% CI: 51-100.00), foxes (4.12%; 95% CI: 0.17-8.08), hedgehogs (33.33%; 95% CI: 0.00-71.05) and a roe deer. Bartonella rochalimae was the most common Bartonella species (i.e. in 4 foxes and 2 wolves) detected. Candidatus B. merieuxii and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii were identified for the first time in wolves. Furthermore, Bartonella schoenbuchensis was identified in a roe deer and a new clone with phylogenetic proximity to B. clarridgeiae was detected in European hedgehogs. Zoonotic and other Bartonella species were significantly more frequent in Eurasian wolves (p < .0001), than in other free-ranging wild mammals, representing a potential reservoir for infection in humans and domestic animals.

Keywords: Bartonella; Eurasian wolf; hedgehog; red fox; roe deer; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(a) Sampling sites, number and distribution of wolves, red foxes, badgers, martens, roe deer and hedgehogs according to the administrative regional and provincial boundaries of the study area: Campania region (AV ‐ Avellino, BN ‐ Benevento, CE ‐ Caserta, NA ‐ Naples, SA – Salerno); Basilicata region (PZ ‐ Potenza, MT ‐ Matera). (b) Number and distribution of wildlife positive to different Bartonella species according to the administrative regional and provincial boundaries of the study area. Campania region (AV ‐ Avellino, BN ‐ Benevento, CE ‐ Caserta, NA ‐ Naples, SA – Salerno); Basilicata region (PZ ‐ Potenza, MT ‐ Matera)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Phylogenetic trees displaying the diversity of Bartonella species detected in wild mammals from Italy. The phylogenetic trees for partial ITS (600 bp) (panel a) and rpoB (357 bp) (panel b) sequences from representative known Bartonella isolates were generated by using MEGA‐X v. 10.0.5 software. Maximum likelihood method with Tamura Nei 3‐parameter substitution model, a proportion of invariable sites and a gamma distribution of rate variation across sites was applied supplying statistical support with subsampling over 1,000 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are provided for reference isolates with the sequence from Brucella abortus (AE017223) used as outgroup. The representative sequences generated in the present study are marked with arrows. Asterisks denote the nucleotide sequences identical to strains retrieved from red foxes. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Phylogenetic trees displaying the diversity of Bartonella species detected in wild mammals from Italy. The phylogenetic trees for partial gltA (290 bp) (panel a), and ssrA (254 bp) (panel b) sequences from representative known Bartonella isolates were generated by using mega‐x v. 10.0.5 software. Maximum likelihood method with Tamura Nei 3‐parameter substitution model, a proportion of invariable sites and a gamma distribution of rate variation across sites was applied supplying statistical support with subsampling over 1,000 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are provided for reference isolates with the sequence from Brucella abortus (AE017223) used as outgroup. The representative sequences generated in the present study are marked with arrows. Asterisks denote the nucleotide sequences identical to strains retrieved from red foxes. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site

References

    1. Abdullah, S. , Helps, C. , Tasker, S. , Newbury, H. , & Wall, R. (2019). Pathogens in fleas collected from cats and dogs: Distribution and prevalence in the UK. Parasites & Vectors, 12(1), 71. 10.1186/s13071-019-3326-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ambrogi, C. , Ragagli, C. , Decaro, N. , Ferroglio, E. , Mencucci, M. , Apollonio, M. , & Mannelli, A. (2019). Health survey on the wolf population in Tuscany, Italy. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 30(1), 19–23. 10.4404/hystrix-00100-2018 - DOI
    1. Bai, Y. , Gilbert, A. , Fox, K. , Osikowicz, L. , & Kosoy, M. Bartonella rochalimae and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii in wild carnivores from Colorado, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 52(4):844‐849. 10.7589/2016-01-015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bateman, P. W. , & Fleming, P. A. (2012). Urban carnivores. Journal of Zoology, 287, 1–23. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00887.x - DOI
    1. Bezerra‐Santos, M. A. , & Otranto, D. (2020). Keds, the enigmatic flies and their role as vectors of pathogens. Acta Tropica, 209, 105521. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105521 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources