Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;54(8):1246-1262.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13523. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

Do orthodontic tooth movements induce pulp necrosis? A systematic review

T Weissheimer  1 , E J N L Silva  2   3 , K P Pinto  3 , G B Só  1 , R A Rosa  1 , M V R Só  1
Affiliations

Do orthodontic tooth movements induce pulp necrosis? A systematic review

T Weissheimer et al. Int Endod J. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic tooth movements are performed by applying forces on teeth, which may cause alterations within the dental pulp. Previously published systematic reviews on the subject only included a small number of studies that assessed pulp status through reliable diagnostic methods. Since then, new evidence has been published, and a further systematic review on the subject is necessary.

Objectives: To evaluate whether there is scientific evidence to support the possibility that orthodontic tooth movements could induce pulp necrosis.

Methods: A systematic search of articles published until June 2020 was performed using MeSH and free terms in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, SciELO, Web of Science, EMBASE, Open Grey and Grey Literature databases. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs), nonrandomized clinical trials (nRCTs) and longitudinal (prospective or retrospective) studies that evaluated the pulp status of teeth subjected to orthodontic movements using laser Doppler flowmetry or pulse oximetry were included. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tools for randomized trials (RoB 2) and nonrandomized interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Relevant findings were summarized and evaluated. The overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.

Results: Initial screening of databases resulted in 353 studies. In total, 285 studies were excluded because they were duplicates. Of 68 eligible papers, fourteen met the inclusion criteria and were selected for full-text reading. Two studies were excluded due to the methods used to evaluate pulp status. Twelve studies (five RCTs, one nRCT and six prospective) were included. Four RCTs were classified as having an unclear risk of bias and one as having a high risk of bias. The nRCT was classified as having a low risk of bias. Two prospective studies were classified as having a moderate risk of bias and four as having a serious risk of bias. The GRADE analysis demonstrated a low to very low quality of evidence.

Discussion: Significant limitations regarding the randomization processes within the included RCTs and a lack of control of confounders on most nonrandomized and longitudinal studies were verified.

Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that orthodontic movements do not induce loss of pulp vitality with low to very low certainty of evidence.

Keywords: dental pulp necrosis; orthodontic movement; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abu Alhaija ESJ, Al-Abdallah SY, Taha NA (2019) A comparative study of initial changes in pulpal blood flow between clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 156, 603-10.
    1. Abu Alhaija ESJ, Taha NA (2020) A comparative study of initial changes in pulpal blood flow between clear aligners and self-ligating fixed orthodontic brackets during leveling and alignment stage. Clinical Oral Investigations 25, 971-81.
    1. Alomari FA, Al-Habahbeh R, Alsakarna BK (2011) Responses of pulp sensibility tests during orthodontic treatment and retention. International Endodontic Journal 44, 635-43.
    1. Aminoshariae A, Kulild JC, Syed A (2018) Cone-beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiographic lesions in endodontic outcome studies: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics 44, 1626-31.
    1. Antony DP, Thomas T, Nivedhitha M (2020) Two-dimensional periapical, panoramic radiography versus three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of periapical lesion after endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Cureus 12, e7736.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources