Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0249319.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249319. eCollection 2021.

Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study

Affiliations

Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study

Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Faculty development programs (FD) prepare the faculty for their educational role and career tasks. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FDP in advancing the quality of short-answer questions (SAQs). This was a quasi-experimental study, comprising 37 new faculty. The SAQs were examined on psychometric analysis and Bloom's cognitive levels for the two educational blocks of 1st medical year (i.e. Musculoskeletal (MSK) and Renal blocks). We found substantial improvement in the discrimination index values of SAQs prepared after the workshop (p = 0.04). A higher number of SAQs with moderate difficulty and higher discrimination were also observed. Flaws within the post-workshop questions were reduced (3.0%) when compared with pre-workshop (12.5%). The major incline was also reported within Bloom's cognitive levels when pre-workshop K2 questions (30%) were compared with post-workshop (45.5%) with a p-value = 0.05. The SAQs constructed by the faculty member without participating in FDP are generally of unsatisfactory quality. After the FDP the assessment items of two blocks improved for various parameters of student assessment. The current study advocates that newly joined faculty shall be provided with the FDP to be guided, trained and supported for improving the quality of assessment through SAQs items writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Structure of SAQs items’ writing construction workshop flowchart of the workshop activities in relation to Kirkpatrick’s model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Naeem N., van der Vleuten C., and Alfaris E.A., Faculty development on item writing substantially improves item quality. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2012. 17(3): p. 369–76. 10.1007/s10459-011-9315-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karakitsiou D.E., et al.., The good student is more than a listener—The 12+1 roles of the medical student. Med Teach, 2012. 34(1): p. e1–8. 10.3109/0142159X.2012.638006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Drew S., Perceptions of What Helps Learn and Develop in Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 2010. 6(3): p. 309–331.
    1. Norcini J., et al.., Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach, 2011. 33(3): p. 206–14. 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmad T., Sattar K., and Akram A., Medical professionalism videos on YouTube: Content exploration and appraisal of user engagement. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2020. 27(9): p. 2287–2292. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources