Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients
- PMID: 33781627
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.246
Risk factors for local recurrence and long term survival after minimally invasive intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: Multivariate analysis in 161 patients
Abstract
Introduction: Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anal-sparing technique as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Oncological safety is still debated. This study analyses long-term oncological results and evaluates risk factors for local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) after minimally-invasive ISR.
Materials and methods: Retrospective single-center data were collected from a prospectively maintained colorectal database. A total of 161 patients underwent ISR between 2008 and 2018. OS and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Risk factors for OS and LRFS were assessed with Cox-regression analysis.
Results: Median follow-up was 55 months. LR occurred in 18 patients. OS and LRFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 80% and 96%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Tumor size (p = 0.035) and clinical T-stage (p = 0.029) were risk factors for LRFS on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR 2.546 (95% CI: 0.976-6.637); p = 0.056) and clinical T-stage (HR 3.296 (95% CI: 0.941-11.549); p = 0.062) were not significant. Preoperative CEA (p < 0.001), pathological T-stage (p = 0.033), pathological N-stage (p = 0.016) and adjuvant treatment (p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS on univariate analysis. Preoperative CEA (HR 4.453 (95% CI: 2.015-9.838); p < 0.001) was a prognostic factor on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: This study confirms the oncological safety of minimally-invasive ISR for locally advanced low-lying rectal tumors when performed in experienced centers. Despite not a risk factor for LR, tumor size and, locally advanced T-stage with anterior involvement should be carefully evaluated for optimal surgical strategy. Preoperative CEA is a prognostic factor for OS.
Keywords: Anal sparing surgery; Intersphincteric resection; Minimally invasive surgery; Pelvic local recurrence; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Initial cT3 Juxta-Anal Rectal Cancer.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jun;29(6):809-816. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0606. Epub 2018 Dec 31. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019. PMID: 30596539
-
Long-term Oncologic Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Intersphincteric Resection With Coloanal Anastomosis for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Apr;62(4):408-416. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001321. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 30688680
-
Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen/tumor size in rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 7;25(33):4945-4958. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4945. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31543685 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.Surg Today. 2019 Apr;49(4):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1754-4. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Surg Today. 2019. PMID: 30604217 Review.
-
Prognostic impact of tumor location after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer: A single-center propensity score matching analysis based on 1806 cases.Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Apr 9;29(1):99. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03114-6. Tech Coloproctol. 2025. PMID: 40205263 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes.Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):1851-1860. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01396-1. Epub 2022 Oct 5. Updates Surg. 2022. PMID: 36198884
-
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;37(6):351-367. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00836.0119. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Ann Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 34784706 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical efficacy and pathological outcomes of transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):933-944. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.933. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38577453 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcomes and failure patterns after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection in ultralow rectal cancers.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):1104-1115. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i6.1104. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37405105 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term efficacy and short-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection vs abdominoperineal resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 7;31(29):110004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.110004. World J Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40809926 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources