Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;15(9):2738-2747.
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00959-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization

Affiliations

The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization

Chao Wang et al. ISME J. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Microorganisms drive soil carbon mineralization and changes in their activity with increased temperature could feedback to climate change. Variation in microbial biodiversity and the temperature sensitivities (Q10) of individual taxa may explain differences in the Q10 of soil respiration, a possibility not previously examined due to methodological limitations. Here, we show phylogenetic and taxonomic variation in the Q10 of growth (5-35 °C) among soil bacteria from four sites, one from each of Arctic, boreal, temperate, and tropical biomes. Differences in the temperature sensitivities of taxa and the taxonomic composition of communities determined community-assembled bacterial growth Q10, which was strongly predictive of soil respiration Q10 within and across biomes. Our results suggest community-assembled traits of microbial taxa may enable enhanced prediction of carbon cycling feedbacks to climate change in ecosystems across the globe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Soil respiration, microbial growth, and their temperature sensitivity.
Cumulative soil respiration (A) and microbial growth rate (C) for soils from four biomes over a 5-day incubation at four temperatures (5–35 °C). Soil respiration temperature sensitivity (Q10, B) and microbial growth rate temperature sensitivity (Q10, D) were calculated for each soil between incubation temperatures (mean ± standard error). Statistical analysis of the differences for each variable among temperatures can be found in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Microbial biomass and respiration.
Relationship between new microbial biomass production (μg C g−1 soil, Ln transformed) and soil respiration (μg C g1 soil, Ln transformed) over a 5-day incubation for four temperatures (5–35 °C) and four biomes ranging from Arctic to tropical.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Temperature sensitivity of respiration and growth.
Relationship between the community-weighted temperature sensitivity (Q10) of microbial growth and temperature sensitivity soil respiration for three temperature ranges and four biomes ranging from Arctic to tropical.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Temperature sensitivity of microbial growth in relation to bacterial phylogeny.
A Each phylotype was categorized based on its maximum Q10 among 5–15, 15–25, and 25–35 °C as “cold,” “moderate,” or “warm” responders. The pie charts represent proportion of growth Q10 values in each response category at class level (with exception for Chloroflexi phyla) using data from all four sites. B Total proportion of growth Q10 response for each biome and across all biomes. Phylogenetic statistical analysis for growth Q10 was provided in Supplementary Table 4.

References

    1. Bradford MA, Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Fierer N, Raymond PA, Crowther TW. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2016;6:751–8. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3071. - DOI
    1. Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN, Azam F, Bakken LR, Baylis M, et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:569–86. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crowther TW, Hoogen JVD, Wan J, Mayes MA, Keiser AD, Mo L, et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science. 2019;365:eaav0550. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heimann M, Reichstein M. Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature. 2008;451:289–92. doi: 10.1038/nature06591. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Allison SD. Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3:909–12. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1951. - DOI

Publication types