Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;56(3):400-408.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13651. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

Developing network adequacy standards for VA Community Care

Kristin M Mattocks  1   2 , A Rani Elwy  3   4 , Elizabeth M Yano  5   6 , Justin Giovannelli  7 , Michael Adelberg  8 , Michelle A Mengeling  9   10 , Kristin J Cunningham  11 , Kameron L Matthews  11
Affiliations

Developing network adequacy standards for VA Community Care

Kristin M Mattocks et al. Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To inform how the VA should develop and implement network adequacy standards, we convened an expert panel to discuss Community Care Network (CCN) adequacy and how VA might implement network adequacy standards for community care.

Data sources/study setting: Data were generated from expert panel ratings and from an audio-recorded expert panel meeting conducted in Arlington, Virginia, in October 2017.

Study design: We used a modified Delphi panel process involving one round of expert panel ratings provided by nine experts in network adequacy standards. Expert panel members received a list of network adequacy standard measures used in commercial and government market and were provided a rating form listing a total of 11 measures and characteristics to rate.

Data collection methods: Items on the rating form were individually discussed during an expert panel meeting between the nine expert panel members and VA Office of Community Care leaders. Attendees addressed discordant views and generated revised or new standards accordingly. Recorded audio data were transcribed to facilitate thematic analysis regarding opportunities and challenges with implementing network adequacy standards in VA Community Care.

Principal findings: The five highest ranked standards were network directories for Veterans, regular reporting of network adequacy data to VA, maximum wait time/distance standards, minimum ratio of providers to enrolled population, and qualitative assessments of network adequacy. During the expert panel discussion with VA Community Care leaders, opportunities and challenges implementing network adequacy standards were highlighted.

Conclusions: Our expert panel shed light on priorities for network adequacy to be implemented under CCN contracts, such as developing comprehensive provider directories for Veterans to use when selecting community providers. Remaining questions focus on whether the VA could reasonably develop and implement network adequacy standards given current Congressional restraints on VA reimbursement to community providers.

Keywords: Community Care; Veterans; choice; healthcare access; policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts exist.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Maximum drive times and appointment availability times
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mattocks K, Mengeling M, Sadler A, et al. The Veteran’s Choice Act: a qualitative examination of rapid policy implementation in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Med Care. 2017;55:S71‐S75. - PubMed
    1. Mattocks K, Yano EM, Brown AN, et al. Examining women Veteran’s experiences, perceptions and challenges with the Veterans Choice Program (VCP). Med Care. 2018;56(7):557‐560. - PubMed
    1. Sayre GG, Neely EL, Simons CE, et al. Accessing care through the Veterans Choice Program: the Veteran experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(10):1714‐1720. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones AL, Fine MJ, Stone RA, et al. Veteran satisfaction with early experiences of health care through the Veterans Choice Program: a concurrent mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1925‐1933. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, et al. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the Veterans Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(4):598‐603. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources