Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;30(S1):43-51.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.13328.

Mediotrusive Occlusal Contacts: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Terry R Walton  1 , Danielle M Layton  2
Affiliations
Review

Mediotrusive Occlusal Contacts: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Terry R Walton et al. J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of mediotrusive (MT) occlusal contacts has been a topic of controversy and confusion in both clinical practice and in the dental literature. The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to explore whether MT interferences are harmful in the natural or therapeutic occlusion directed by 4 focus questions relating to prevalence, jaw function, jaw dysfunction and biomechanical models.

Materials and methods: An electronic search in October 2020 sought evidence in MEDLINE (Ovid) using (mediotrus* OR nonworking side OR nonworking contact OR balancing side OR interfer* side OR premature contact) in the multipurpose (.mp) search field; and in Google Scholar using permutations of the above. Supplementary articles were sourced from the associated reference lists. There was no language restriction. The search yield was reviewed in duplicate.

Results: The electronic search identified 420 articles. Following screening, 164 were selected for eligibility assessments. Of these, 47 were included in the current paper.

Conclusions: Non-standardized nomenclature and methodology is used to identify MT interferences in patient populations, with resultant prevalence varying from 0% to 77%, (median = 16%). MT interferences may alter the biomechanics of mandibular function. Together with the presence of repeated high loads resultant strain can manifest as pathophysiology of the temporomandibular joint and associated muscle structures. MT interferences should be avoided in any therapeutic occlusal scheme to minimize pulpal, periodontal, structural and mechanical complications or exacerbation of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Naturally occurring molar MT interferences should be eliminated only if signs and symptoms of TMDs are present. Literature supports there being a biomechanical basis which can explain how MT interferences may affect temporomandibular joint morphology and jaw function.

Keywords: Occlusion; mediotrusive contacts; mediotrusive interferences; temporomandibular joint disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Marklund S, Wänman A: A century of controversy regarding the benefit or detriment of occlusal contacts on the mediotrusive side. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:553-5622
    1. Schuyler CH: Fundamental principles in the correction of occlusal disharmony, natural and artificial. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22:1193-1202
    1. Ramfjord SP: Bruxism, a clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Assoc 1961;62:21-44
    1. Minagi S, Watanabe H, Sato T, et al: The relationship between balancing-side occlusal contact patterns and temporomandibular joint sounds in humans: proposition of the concept of balancing-side protection. J Craniomand Disord 1990;4:251-256
    1. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(5S):e61-e62

LinkOut - more resources