Effect of a dedicated mitral heart team compared to a general heart team on survival: a retrospective, comparative, non-randomized interventional cohort study based on prospectively registered data
- PMID: 33783480
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab065
Effect of a dedicated mitral heart team compared to a general heart team on survival: a retrospective, comparative, non-randomized interventional cohort study based on prospectively registered data
Abstract
Objectives: Although in both the US and European guidelines the 'heart team approach' is a class I recommendation, supporting evidence is still lacking. Therefore, we sought to provide comparative survival data of patients with mitral valve disease referred to the general and the dedicated heart team.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort, patients evaluated for mitral valve disease by a general heart team (2009-2014) and a dedicated mitral valve heart team (2014-2018) were included. Decision-making was recorded prospectively in heart team electronic forms. The end point was overall survival from decision of the heart team.
Results: In total, 1145 patients were included of whom 641 (56%) were discussed by dedicated heart team and 504 (44%) by general heart team. At 5 years, survival probability was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.79] for the dedicated heart team group compared to 0.70 (95% CI 0.66-0.74, P = 0.040) for the general heart team. Relative risk of mortality adjusted for EuroSCORE II, treatment groups (surgical, transcatheter and non-intervention), mitral valve pathology (degenerative, functional, rheumatic and others) and 13 other baseline characteristics for patients in the dedicated heart team was 29% lower [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95; P = 0.019] than for the general heart team. The adjusted relative risk of mortality was 61% lower for patients following the advice of the heart team (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62; P < 0.001) and 43% lower for patients following the advice of the general heart team (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87; P = 0.010) compared to those who did not follow the advice of the heart team.
Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, patients treated for mitral valve disease based on a dedicated heart team decision have significantly higher survival independent of the allocated treatment, mitral valve pathology and baseline characteristics.
Keywords: Heart team; Mitral valve disease; Multidisciplinary decision-making.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Specialists give better care than generalists for mitral valve disease.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 30;60(2):274-275. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab103. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 34021324 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Heart team approach in treatment of mitral regurgitation: patient selection and outcome.Open Heart. 2020 Jul;7(2):e001280. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001280. Open Heart. 2020. PMID: 32690553 Free PMC article.
-
Multidisciplinary decision-making in mitral valve disease: the mitral valve heart team.Neth Heart J. 2019 Apr;27(4):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1238-1. Neth Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30742250 Free PMC article.
-
Survival of transcatheter mitral valve repair compared with surgical and conservative treatment in high-surgical-risk patients.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.171. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 25147032
-
Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 20727782 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of concomitant mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass surgery versus isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug;50(2):212-22. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw022. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26888462 Review.
Cited by
-
An Individualized Approach of Multidisciplinary Heart Team for Myocardial Revascularization and Valvular Heart Disease-State of Art.J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 28;12(5):705. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050705. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35629130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
At the Crossroads of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery-Benching Single Hospital Experience to a National Registry: A Plea for Risk Management Technology.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Aug 11;9(8):261. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080261. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022. PMID: 36005425 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Management after Expert Multidisciplinary Valve Team Evaluation.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 31;13(15):4487. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154487. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124754 Free PMC article.
-
Decision Making during the Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Focused Review for the Starting Minimally Invasive Surgeon.J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 11;11(20):5993. doi: 10.3390/jcm11205993. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36294310 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The current state of the multidisciplinary heart team approach: a systematic review.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Dec 26;67(1):ezae461. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae461. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39693114 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources