Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;23(9):601-608.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0097. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

One Year Real-World Use of the Control-IQ Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Technology

Affiliations

One Year Real-World Use of the Control-IQ Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Technology

Marc D Breton et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The t:slim X2™ insulin pump with Control-IQ® technology from Tandem Diabetes Care is an advanced hybrid closed-loop system that was first commercialized in the United States in January 2020. Longitudinal glycemic outcomes associated with real-world use of this system have yet to be reported. Methods: A retrospective analysis of Control-IQ technology users who uploaded data to Tandem's t:connect® web application as of February 11, 2021 was performed. Users age ≥6 years, with >2 weeks of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data pre- and >12 months post-Control-IQ technology initiation were included in the analysis. Results: In total 9451 users met the inclusion criteria, 83% had type 1 diabetes, and the rest had type 2 or other forms of diabetes. The mean age was 42.6 ± 20.8 years, and 52% were female. Median percent time in automation was 94.2% [interquartile range, IQR: 90.1%-96.4%] for the entire 12-month duration of observation, with no significant changes over time. Of these users, 9010 (96.8%) had ≥75% of their CGM data available, that is, sufficient data for reliable computation of CGM-based glycemic outcomes. At baseline, median percent time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was 63.6 (IQR: 49.9%-75.6%) and increased to 73.6% (IQR: 64.4%-81.8%) for the 12 months of Control-IQ technology use with no significant changes over time. Median percent time <70 mg/dL remained consistent at ∼1% (IQR: 0.5%-1.9%). Conclusion: In this real-world use analysis, Control-IQ technology retained, and to some extent exceeded, the results obtained in randomized controlled trials, showing glycemic improvements in a broad age range of people with different types of diabetes.

Keywords: Automated insulin dosing; Closed-loop control; Continuous glucose monitoring; Time in range.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.D.B. reports research support from Dexcom, Inc., Arecor Ltd., Novo Nordisk A/S, and Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc; M.D.B. reports consulting fees from Dexcom, Inc., Arecor, and Adocia. B.P.K. reports research support handled by the University of Virginia from Dexcom, Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, and Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc; M.D.B. and B.P.K. report patent royalties, managed by the University of Virginia, from Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, and Dexcom.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Violin graph representing percent time in automation over 365 days of Control-IQ (CIQ) technology use by type of diabetes (A: T1DM, B: T2DM).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Consensus CGM outcomes for baseline and Control-IQ use over time. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Median (line and markers) and quartiles (envelop) of Time In Range (TIR, 70–180 mg/dL) over time of day by types of Diabetes (A: T1DM, B: T2DM) for Baseline and 1 year of CIQ use.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Overall distribution of Time In Range (TIR, 70-180mg/dL) at baseline and over time of CIQ use. Horizontal line shows median and filled rectangle represent the 50% of data within the first and third quartiles, whiskers represent minimum and maximum values.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
Overall distribution of Time Below Range (TBR, <70mg/dL) at baseline and over time of CIQ use. Horizontal line shows median and filled rectangle represent the 50% of data within the first and third quartiles, whiskers represent minimum and maximum values.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Consensus CGM outcomes for baseline and 12-months Control-IQ use broken down by age groups.

References

    1. Kovatchev BP: A century of diabetes technology: signals, models, and artificial pancreas control. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2019;30:432–444 - PubMed
    1. Hovorka R, Chassin LJ, Wilinska ME, et al. : Closing the loop: the ADICOL experience. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:307–318 - PubMed
    1. Steil GM, Rebrin K, Darwin C, et al. : Feasibility of automating insulin delivery for the treatment of Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes 2006;55:3344–3350 - PubMed
    1. Dassau E, Zisser H, Harvey R, et al. : “Clinical Evaluation of a Personalized Artificial Pancreas.” Diabetes Care 2013;36:801–809 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doyle III FJ, Huyett LM, Lee JB, et al. : Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: engineering the Algorithms. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1191–1197 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types