Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun:61:51-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

Structure-based design of novel polyhedral protein nanomaterials

Affiliations
Review

Structure-based design of novel polyhedral protein nanomaterials

Alena Khmelinskaia et al. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Organizing matter at the atomic scale is a central goal of nanotechnology. Bottom-up approaches, in which molecular building blocks are programmed to assemble via supramolecular interactions, are a proven and versatile route to new and useful nanomaterials. Although a wide variety of molecules have been used as building blocks, proteins have several intrinsic features that present unique opportunities for designing nanomaterials with sophisticated functions. There has been tremendous recent progress in designing proteins to fold and assemble to highly ordered structures. Here we review the leading approaches to the design of closed polyhedral protein assemblies, highlight the importance of considering the assembly process itself, and discuss various applications and future directions for the field. We emphasize throughout the exciting opportunities presented by recent advances as well as challenges that remain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure-based design of novel protein nanomaterials. (a) Example of a rationally designed protein nanomaterial (I53_dn5) [35], highlighting the three distinct surfaces available for modification: (i) interior, (ii) exterior, and (iii) inter-subunit. (b) Most common strategies for the rational design of 3D bound protein materials. Schematic representation and surface maps of successful examples of tetrahedral assemblies resulting from each design strategy (i. PDB ID 3VDX [9], ii. [24], iii. PDB ID 6OT7 [30], iv. PDB ID 4NWN [26]). (c) Survey of structural specifications of well-defined designed assemblies. Outer diameters of the design models (colored polygons and circles: black, natural assemblies; purple, interface design; blue, metal-mediated; orange, genetic fusion; red, coiled-coil, green, edge traversal; pentagons, icosahedral symmetry; squares, octahedral symmetry; triangles, tetrahedral symmetry; circles, other) are plotted from explicitly stated published values, or values estimated from scale images or experimental data. Inner diameters (left end of colored lines) correspond to published values, or are estimated by subtracting the width of the protein component(s) from the outer diameter. Lumen volumes (small gray polygons and circles, designed assemblies; small black polygons, natural assemblies; blue-trimmed black square, metal-redesigned ferritin) are estimated from inner diameter. Black dashed traces plot the relationship between outer diameter and lumen volume for spheres with 2 nm and 5 nm shell thicknesses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of controlled and uncontrolled assembly and disassembly. (a) An example of an assembly that is both uncontrolled and non-cooperative, which proceeds simultaneously with protein synthesis, non-specifically encapsulating intracellular contaminants (violet) and resulting in a variety of higher-order structures. A disassembly and purification step is thus required to access the nanomaterial interior and allow for error correction to proceed toward a single target structure that could encapsulate a molecular cargo (blue). Heterogeneity of the assembled product leads to inconsistent cargo protection and release properties. (b) An ideal multi-component assembly is inherently controllable by intentional sequestration and mixing of individually prepared components. Alternatively (or additionally), assembly can be triggered by a physical or biochemical condition, allowing simultaneous assembly and encapsulation. Cooperative assembly yields a uniform product, which prevents premature cargo release.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Selection of current applications of rationally designed polyhedral protein assemblies, grouped by the surface addressed for their realization. Examples are provided for each category: a nanoparticle vaccine based on the two-component icosahedral nanoparticle I53_dn5 displaying genetically fused influenza hemagglutinin (Boyoglu-Barnum et al., bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2020.05.30.125179), the two-component octahedral assembly o42.1, which integrates Fc domains as dimeric components (Divine et al., manuscript submitted), and the two-component icosahedral nanoparticle I53–50-v4 with its mRNA-packaging interior lumen highlighted [50].

References

    1. Pieters BJGE, van Eldijk MB, Nolte RJM, Mecinović J: Natural supramolecular protein assemblies. Chem Soc Rev 2016, 45:24–39. - PubMed
    1. Douglas T, Young M: Viruses: making friends with old foes. Science 2006, 312:873–875. - PubMed
    1. Bhaskar S, Lim S: Engineering protein nanocages as carriers for biomedical applications. NPG Asia Mater 2017, 9:e371. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamley IW: Protein Assemblies: Nature-Inspired and Designed Nanostructures. Biomacromolecules 2019, 20:1829–1848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norn CH, André I: Computational design of protein self-assembly. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2016, 39:39–45. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources