Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan-Dec:27:10760296211002914.
doi: 10.1177/10760296211002914.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis

Mira Merashli et al. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

The relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and sickle cell disease (SCD) has never been systematically addressed. Our aim was to evaluate potential links between SCD and aPL in all age groups. EMBASE/PubMed was screened from inception to May 2020 and Peto odds ratios for rare events were calculated. The pooled prevalence (PP) of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) was higher in individuals with SCD than in controls (27.9% vs 8.7%, P < 0.0001), that of IgM aCL was similar in the two groups (2.9% vs 2.7%); only individuals with SCD were positive for lupus anticoagulant (LA) (7.7% vs 0%, P < 0.0001). The PP of leg ulcers was similar between aPL positive and negative individuals (44% vs 53%) and between patients in acute crisis and stable patients (5.6% vs 7.3%). Reporting of aPL as a binary outcome and not as a titer precluded further interpretation. The results indicate that a prospective case-control study with serial measurements of a panel of aPL in SCD patients might be warranted, in order to understand further the possible pathogenic role of aPL in SCD.

Keywords: anticardiolipin antibodies; antiphospholipid antibodies; leg ulcers; lupus anticoagulant; meta-analysis; sickle cell disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart showing the study selection process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect size of (A) IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), (B) IgM aCL and (C) lupus anticoagulant (LA) in participants with sickle cell disease (SCD) and controls (CTR). 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and leg ulcers in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) and controls (CTR). 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Darbari DS, Sheehan VA, Ballas SK. The vaso-occlusive pain crisis in sickle cell disease: definition, pathophysiology, and management. Eur J Haematol. 2020;105(3):237–246. doi:10.1111/ejh.13430 - PubMed
    1. Usmani A, Machado RF. Vascular complications of sickle cell disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;68(2-3):205–221. doi:10.3233/CH-189008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noubiap JJ, Temgoua MN, Tankeu R, et al. Sickle cell disease, sickle trait and the risk for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb J. 2018;16(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12959-018-0179-z - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennewitz MF, Jimenez MA, Vats R, et al. Lung vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease mediated by arteriolar neutrophil-platelet microemboli. JCI Insight. 2017;2(1):e89761. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.89761 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundd P, Gladwin MT, Novelli EM. Pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2019;14:263–292. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012838 - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources