Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 30;19(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02199-1.

Efficacy of the association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for the treatment of solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective single-center study

Affiliations

Efficacy of the association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for the treatment of solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective single-center study

Zhenfeng Deng et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The feasibility of association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, maximal diameter ≥ 10 cm) remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of ALPPS for patients with solitary huge HCC.

Methods: Twenty patients with solitary huge HCC who received ALPPS during January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The oncological characteristics of contemporaneous patients who underwent one-stage resection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) were compared using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results: All patients underwent complete two-staged ALPPS. The median future liver remnant from the ALPPS-I stage to the ALPPS-II stage increased by 64.5% (range = 22.3-221.9%) with a median interval of 18 days (range = 10-54 days). The 90-day mortality rate after the ALPPS-II stage was 5%. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.0% and 57.4%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 60.0% and 43.0%, respectively. In the one-to-one PSM analysis, the long-term survival of patients who received ALPPS was significantly better than those who received TACE (OS, P = 0.007; PFS, P = 0.011) but comparable with those who underwent one-stage resection (OS, P = 0.463; PFS, P = 0.786).

Conclusion: The surgical outcomes of ALPPS were superior to those of TACE and similar to those of one-stage resection. ALPPS is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with unresectable solitary huge HCC.

Keywords: ALPPS; Future liver remnant; Outcomes; Solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of the CT diagram and the IQQA 3D reconstructed model of the liver in patients with solitary huge HCC during perioperation of ALPPS. Abbreviations: CT, computed tomographic; IQQA, intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analyses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship of Ishak fibrosis scores and KGR of FLR between the ALPPS-I and the ALPPS-II stages. The median KGR of patients with Ishak fibrosis scores of 1&2, 3&4, and 5&6 were 37.2, 23.2, and 14.6 cm3/day, respectively. The KGR values of patients with Ishak fibrosis scores of 1&2 or 3&4 were significantly higher than those with Ishak fibrosis scores of 5&6 (scores 1&2 vs. 5&6: P = 0.014; scores 3&4 vs. 5&6: P = 0.009). Abbreviations: KGR, kinetic growth rate; FLR, future liver remnant; ALPPS, association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Survival analyses of total patients enrolled in this study. No significant difference was observed between ALPPS and one-stage resection patients on (a) the OS (P = 0.770) and (b) the PFS (P = 0.483) rates. However, (a) the OS (P = 0.045) and (b) the PFS (P = 0.034) rates of patients with ALPPS were significantly better than those with TACE. Abbreviations: ALPPS, association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Survival analyses between ALPPS and the matched one-stage resection groups. No significant difference was observed between the ALPPS and the one-stage resection groups on (a) the OS (P = 0.463) and (b) the PFS (P = 0.786) rates. Abbreviation: ALPPS, association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Survival analyses between ALPPS and the matched TACE groups. a The OS (P = 0.007) and b the PFS (P = 0.011) rates of patients in the ALPPS group were significantly better than those in the TACE group. Abbreviations: ALPPS, association liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca-A Cancer Journal For Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Zhu AX, Murad MH, Marrero JA. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):358–380. doi: 10.1002/hep.29086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhong JH, Ke Y, Gong WF, Xiang BD, Ma L, Ye XP, Peng T, Xie GS, Li LQ. Hepatic resection associated with good survival for selected patients with intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):329–340. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao H, Zhang B, Mei B, Zuo C, Wei G, Wang R, Zhang B, Chen X. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal hypertension: a long-term benefit compared with transarterial chemoembolization and thermal ablation. Medicine. 2015;94(7):e495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000495. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017;11(4):317–370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources