Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;147(4):e2020020610.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-020610. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

Adolescent Risk Behavior Screening and Interventions in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Adolescent Risk Behavior Screening and Interventions in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review

Nora Pfaff et al. Pediatrics. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Context: Risky behaviors are the main threats to adolescents' health; consequently, evidence-based guidelines recommend annual comprehensive risk behavior screening.

Objective: To review studies of adolescent risk behavior screening and interventions in urgent care, emergency department (ED), and hospital settings.

Data sources: Our data sources included PubMed (1965-2019) and Embase (1947-2019).

Study selection: Studies were included on the basis of population (adolescents aged 10-25 years), topic (risk behavior screening or intervention), and setting (urgent care, ED, or hospital). Studies were excluded if they involved younger children or adults or only included previously identified high-risk adolescents.

Data extraction: Data extracted were risk behavior screening rates, screening and intervention tools, and attitudes toward screening and intervention.

Results: Forty-six studies were included; most (38 of 46) took place in the ED, and a single risk behavior domain was examined (sexual health [19 of 46], mood and suicidal ideation [12 of 46], substance use [7 of 46], and violence [2 of 46]). In 6 studies, authors examined comprehensive risk behavior screening, demonstrating low rates at baseline (∼10%) but significant increases with clinician reminder implementation. Adolescents and clinicians were highly accepting of risk behavior screening in all settings and preferred electronic screening over a face-to-face interview. Reported barriers were time constraints and limited resources.

Limitations: Only 1 included study was a randomized controlled trial, and there was large heterogeneity of included studies, potentially limiting generalizability.

Conclusions: Rates of adolescent risk behavior screening are low in urgent care, ED, and hospital settings. Our findings outline promising tools for improving screening and intervention, highlighting the critical need for continued development and testing of interventions in these settings to improve adolescent care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources