Clinical evaluation of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on long-term experiences
- PMID: 33786134
- PMCID: PMC7991931
- DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.93984
Clinical evaluation of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on long-term experiences
Abstract
Introduction: The endovascular method as a less invasive treatment for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has become an alternative to conventional open surgery.
Aim: The objective of the present study was to analyse the outcomes of endovascular treatment of AAA patients in long-term observation.
Material and methods: A group of 236 AAA patients subjected to planned endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between 2010 and 2015 was reviewed. Rates of mortality, surgical complications and re-interventions were collected in the separate time periods, i.e. up to 30 days after surgery, 30 days to 3 years, and from 3 to 5 years after surgery. Cumulative rates of these parameters were evaluated in the short-term (up to 30 days after surgery), medium-term (up to 3 years), and long-term (up to 5 years after surgery) perspective.
Results: The median age of patients was 75 years, and the most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension (54%) and ischaemic heart disease (52%). Cumulative short-, medium- and long-term mortality rates were 2.5%, 14.2% and 28.9%, respectively. Total rates of surgical complications in short-, medium- and long-term observation were 7.6%, 12.6% and 17.5%, respectively. The cumulative rate of re-interventions ranged from 4.2% to 11.4%.
Conclusions: In the consecutive time periods, the increase in the percentage of surgical complications and re-interventions increased gradually, in contrast to mortality, where the curve grew significantly, which is expected due to the aging and numerous comorbidities in the observed group of patients.
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; long-term outcomes.
Copyright: © 2020 Fundacja Videochirurgii.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Budtz-Lilly J, Venermo M, Debus S, et al. Editor’s Choice – Assessment of international outcomes of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 9 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:13–20. - PubMed
-
- Kulig P, Lewandowski K, Ziaja D, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair or open aneurysm repair for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm – the latest update. Pol Przegl Chir. 2016;88:166–74. - PubMed
-
- Morisaki K, Matsumoto T, Matsubara Y, et al. Elective endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians. Vascular. 2016;24:348–54. - PubMed
-
- Thomas D, Anderson D, Hulten E, et al. Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: incidence of cardiovascular events in 632 patients in a department of defense cohort over 6-year follow-up. Vascular. 2015;23:234–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources