Patients' perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
- PMID: 33786178
- PMCID: PMC7958185
- DOI: 10.1177/20503121211000908
Patients' perspective on prostatic artery embolization: A qualitative study
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to describe the patients' experience of undergoing prostatic artery embolization.
Methods: A retrospective qualitative interview study was undertaken with 15 patients of mean age 73 years who had undergone prostatic artery embolization with a median duration of 210 min at two medium sized hospitals in Sweden. The reasons for conducting prostatic artery embolization were clean intermittent catheterization (n = 4), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 10) or haematuria (n = 1). Data were collected through individual, semi-structured telephone interviews 1-12 months after treatment and analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: Four categories with sub-categories were formulated to describe the results: a diverse experience; ability to control the situation; resumption of everyday activities and range of opinions regarding efficacy of outcomes. Overall, the patients described the procedure as painless, easy and interesting and reported that while the procedure can be stressful, a calm atmosphere contributed to achieving a good experience. Limitations on access to reliable information before, during and after the procedure were highlighted as a major issue. Practical ideas for improving patient comfort during the procedure were suggested. Improved communications between treatment staff and patients were also highlighted. Most patients could resume everyday activities, some felt tired and bruising caused unnecessary worry for a few. Regarding functional outcome, some patients described substantial improvement in urine flow while others were satisfied with regaining undisturbed night sleep. Those with less effect were considering transurethral resection of the prostate as a future option. Self-enrolment to the treatment and long median operation time may have influenced the results.
Conclusions: From the patients' perspective, prostatic artery embolization is a well-tolerated method for treating benign prostate hyperplacia.
Keywords: Prostatic artery embolization; benign prostate hyperplacia; doctor–patient; health care users’ experiences; nurse–patient communication; patient education.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: H.L. has received compensation according to a proctoring and training agreement with ev3 Nordic AB, William Cook Europe ApS and Merit Medical AB. These sponsors had no involvement in any part of the study. The study was conducted without sponsoring from any medical device company. A.H., K.-J. L., M.A., M.T., J.W. and J.S. have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of prostate artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study and propensity-matched comparison with transurethral resection of the prostate (the UK-ROPE study).BJU Int. 2018 Aug;122(2):270-282. doi: 10.1111/bju.14249. Epub 2018 May 6. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29645352
-
Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial.Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 19. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 33612376 Clinical Trial.
-
Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 10 Years' Experience.Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):444-451. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191249. Epub 2020 Jun 2. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32484416
-
Prostatic Artery Embolization versus Standard Surgical Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 30292422
-
What Is New in Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms?Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):46-48. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 28. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. PMID: 29853426 Review.
Cited by
-
Giant prostatic hyperplasia in a 54-years old patient treated by prostate artery embolization: case report.Front Urol. 2024 Nov 29;4:1446650. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1446650. eCollection 2024. Front Urol. 2024. PMID: 40777098 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Perspectives on Perioperative Supportive Care Needs Surrounding Major Abdominal Operations for Cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2597-2605. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12895-1. Epub 2022 Dec 3. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36463355 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, et al.. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2013; 64(1): 118–140. - PubMed
-
- Pyo JS, Cho WJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolisation for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Radiol 2017; 72(1): 16–22. - PubMed
-
- Letterstål A, Eldh AC, Olofsson P, et al.. Patients’ experience of open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm – preoperative information, hospital care and recovery. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19(21–22): 3112–3122. - PubMed
-
- Pettersson M, Bergbom I. The drama of being diagnosed with an aortic aneurysm and undergoing surgery for two different procedures: open repair and endovascular techniques. J Vasc Nurs 2010; 28(1): 2–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources