Desflurane consumption with automated vapour control systems in two different anaesthesia machines. A randomized controlled study
- PMID: 33788249
- DOI: 10.1111/aas.13825
Desflurane consumption with automated vapour control systems in two different anaesthesia machines. A randomized controlled study
Abstract
Background: In general anaesthesia practice a fresh gas flow (FGF) of ≥0.5 L/min is usually applied. Automated gas delivery devices are developed to reduce volatile anaesthetic consumption by limiting gas flow. This study aimed to compare desflurane consumption between automated gas control devices compared to conventional low flow anaesthesia in the Flow-I and Aisys anaesthesia machines, and to compare desflurane consumption between the two automated gas delivery devices. We hypothesised that desflurane consumption would be lower with automated gas delivery compared to conventional low flow anaesthesia, and that desflurane consumption could differ between the different gas delivery devices.
Methods: We allocated 160 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery into four groups, Flow-I with automated gas control, Flow-i with conventional low-flow (1 L/min), Aisys with end tidal gas control and Aisys with conventional low flow. Patients were maintained at minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) 0.7-0.8. Desflurane consumption was recorded after 9, 30 and 60 minutes of anaesthesia.
Results: After 60 minutes, compared to conventional low flow anaesthesia, automated gas delivery systems reduced desflurane consumption from 25.8 to 15.2 mL for the Aisys machine (P < .001) and from 22.1 to 16.8 mL for the Flow-I (P < .001). Time to MAC 0.7 and stable FGF was shorter with Aisys endtidal control compared to Flow-I automated gas control.
Conclusion: Under clinical conditions, we found a reduction in desflurane consumption when using automated gas delivery devices compared to conventional low flow anaesthesia. Both devices were reliable in use.
Keywords: Aisys; Flow-I; automatic gas control; desfluran; gas comsumption; low-flow.
© 2021 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Comment in
-
Seeing the wood for the trees: Insights into reducing inhalational agent consumption.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Aug;65(7):861-862. doi: 10.1111/aas.13926. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021. PMID: 34027997 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Baker AB. Low flow and closed circuits. Anaesth Intens Care. 1994;22:341-342.
-
- Buchinger H, Kreuer S, Paxian M, Larsen R, Wilhelm W. Desflurane and isoflurane in minimal-flow anaesthesia. Anaesthesist. 2006;55:854-860.
-
- Baum J, Berghoff M, Stanke H-G, Petermeyer M, Kalff G. Low-flow anaesthesia with desflurane. Anaesthesist. 1997;46:287-293.
-
- Baum J, Stanke H-G. Low flow and minimal flow anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Anaesthesist Suppl. 1998;47:S70-S76.
-
- Hönemann CW, Hahnenkamp K, Möllhoff T, Baum JA. Minimal-flow anaesthesia with controlled ventilation: comparison between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18:458-466.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources